Situational Judgement Test (Oxford Assess and Progress) 2nd Edition

Not very useful for Singapore setting.

Met my expectation

Have not taken the SJT yet so i cannot comment on the content. However, the book itself is of very low quality. Multiple pages simply fall out of the book with zero force applied to them as if they were never glued to the spine to begin with. This happens every 10-20 pages at random which is frustrating. Additionally, the answers could be laid out in a more organised way but it seems fine for the most part so far.

Used this in the run up to my SJT. Probably the best out of the five books I tried when looking for something to study with. Most questions were spot-on in terms of what came up in the actual exam, some were very different. Would recommend if you feel you need a book to practice but keep the official practice paper nearby to compare the questions that seem slightly off.

I love the small convenient size!having taken the test, with the SJT it seems to me to be a test of 'can you guess the reason for it being in the order we have put it' and reasoning changes question to question (even with some of the official FPAS questions). Human decision making is subjective and so getting a book to teach you to do that in exactly the way FPAS want you to is probably an unrealistic expectation. A handful of the questions in this book are dodgy for sure but I think it is one of the more consistent ones on the market.

I bought this book hoping to get some practice questions on the SJT to help gauge how I was doing. There are a decent bunch of questions in there, but some of the reasoning for the answers are very dubious.An example of one was a situation which considered the appropriateness of mittens to restrain patients from pulling out essential tubes. Two patients had similar clinical situations (no capacity, at risk of pulling out essential tubes), but one had relatives who were 'fiercely' opposed to the use of mittens. For some reason, this made it more appropriate to use mittens that the other patient who didn't have concerned relatives?! And there was no reasoning for this answer! So if a few questions are clearly doubtful, how trustworthy is this book?? Be careful!!!