Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black

When selling my Fujifilm X-S10 system, and changing to a full frame Canon system, I couldn't sell these lenses, since everyone keeps on hovering towards the older 1.4, with an obviously faster aperture and somewhat better boke expression from what I've heard. However, I originally bought these lenses because I wanted to experiment with videography, as the 1.4s AF motors are pretty loud. The F2's motors are fast and quiet. After a few weeks of posting these lenses for sale, I decided that I loved these lenses so much, I decided to expand my photography budget buy an X-T20 as a sub camera, so I could continue using these lenses. Build Quality: The build quality and size are amazing. The design is cool and it complimented my X-S10, X-T20, and borrowed X-T5. Since these are XF lenses, it is sturdy and metallic, and the size is very comfortable (maybe because my hands are about average sized). The aperture ring clicks really comfortably but, it is a little slippery, meaning that I have accidentally turned it to the wrong aperture while shooting a few times. The manual ring feels silky but, it is a tiny bit slippery. The ring's grooves are very comfortable. However, Fujifilm's manual ring grooves notably tend to get dusty easily and are harder to clean compared to Canon's EFs or RFs from experience. In dusty places, I would be a little more cautious. Fujifilm's caps are also usually nicely designed too. Picture Quality: Fujifilm lenses are usually some of the best quality within the mirrorless market. Very sharp. In terms of pictures, these lenses seem to not change much from the 1.4s according to many reviews, and the quality is extraordinarily satisfactory to the point where I have no regrets buying these lenses. Youtuber 'Christopher Frost' explains the XF35mm F2 R WR better with more lab-like tests. Auto Focus: The lens AF is quick, but it's not instant, like more expensive lenses. Essentially, it feels like a premium XF lens that doesn't cost hundreds more. I'm not too detailed in how lenses and body AF work together but, I believe that focus inaccuracy and error is more of a Fujifilm body nuance rather than the lens' problem since the X-S10 and X-T20 respond differently in that aspect. This was one of the main reasons I currently use a Canon full-frame as a main. Overall, it's cheaper and newer than the 1.4, and I have no issues with these lenses. I would definently recommend it.

Let's get this out of the way, first - This lens is only 13 grams lighter than the F1.4. It's 5MM shorter. So if you are looking for this strictly because it's a lighter and shorter lens, well - it IS, but not significantly. That being said, the lens is much better balanced than the front-heavy F1.4 - so it "feels" lighter when taken as a full package, at least with the X-T1. So don't fool yourself into thinking that there are significant weight and size reductions like you'd see in a pancake lens, because there really aren't. That is in NO WAY a mark against this lens, but I know that many are looking to this for the purposes of "weight reduction" - It will feel lighter because it is better balanced, but 13 grams is insignificant in the overall package - it ends up being 2% lighter overall with the X-T1. As long as you aren't looking for a miracle there, this should be your lens of choice over the 35mm F1.4 unless you truly require the extra stop of light - If you think you do, but you aren't sure, then you probably don't - for several reasons: - It's cheaper. The 35MM F1.4 looks good at sale prices right now, but that's only because the F2 R WR is newer. The price will drop more. This is a small point, because nobody got into fuji to save money. - It's weather resistant. I live in Seattle, and I want something I can take into inclement weather and not worry about. The 16mm and 18-135MM have both done well in this regard- I've taken both out in wet weather (and near waterfalls, etc) and I've had zero issues. This should be similar to the 16MM and superior to the 18-135MM in this regard. Fuji's WR system is very well proven at this point. They will never advertise it as waterproof, because no camera maker really does, but it's about as close as you can practically get at this point. I still wouldn't submerge it, that's just common sense, but there's no need to be afraid of weather. - It SEEMS to focus closer. This may be perception, as according to specs, the F1.4 focuses 7 CM closer. That may be the case, but it seems like that rarely ever happened, even deliberately in macro mode (which is supposedly no longer needed with the X-T1). It's something I always thought was really irritating with the F1.4 - and a huge point in favor for this, as there were plenty of times I couldn't focus anywhere near as close as I wanted to with the F1.4. This may not match technical specs, it may have even been a glitch with my F1.4. This is 100% subjective, and is mostly a matter of my own perception. - It focuses much, much faster, but more importantly, there is no focus hunt on this - It just locks focus immediately, with misses being VERY rare, and usually due to operator error or limits of the camera. The overall focus performance as fast as you can reasonably expect for a lens in this era, and leaves the old 1.4 in the dust. Does it completely replace the F1.4? For most people, I'd guess yes. There's a certain mindset that you must have the largest aperture possible for a focal length, and there are others that will gripe that this is really a F3 equivalent - These are largely irrelevant issues, and the type that typically comes with or leads to bad cases of "gear acquisition syndrome." It is true that this doesn't let in as much light. That can affect you when you are shooting in poor lighting at low ISO. Those are also the same cases that really require someone to operate slow, and focus manually, and really take their time with a shot. If you are the sort of photographer that works very slowly and deliberately, and you already have the 35MM F1.4, the only reason to get this lens would be if you are running into close focusing issues, or if you are concerned about weather resistance. For most people, the F2 will result in sharper images (due to the increased depth of field more so than the lens), and better overall usability - There's a chance that action shots will be blurrier or that you will blur a bit more due to hand shake at slower speeds, but that's largely offset by the difficulty of getting in-focus shots at F1.4. I'm not going to get into some of the pixel-peeping details regarding sharpness, etc - there are other resources that can do that better than I can. I'm quite happy with that so far, but it's also really unsurprising as every single Fuji lens is optically excellent. If your images aren't sharp, the first place to look is at your technique. Chasing sharpness via lenses reaches diminishing returns very quickly, and it's easy to start valuing lenses based on some technical quality that's only really observable in controlled conditions. I speak from experience, as I have gone down that route in the past. Don't get either lens over the other based on technical tests. Make the choice based on how you use it. For most people, that choice should be this lens. Finally, if you've always liked the X100 series, but felt that it was too wide and deserved a 35MM equivalent, this lens will put you closer to that than anything else in terms of focus performance, handling, and overall quality. It's still nowhere near the same in terms of close-focus and overall size - The overall package will still be twice as long. So again, don't expect miracles there. This lens is an excellent performer, and should be part of every Fuji X shooters kit. For someone new to the Fuji X system, this should be the first lens you purchase. For those of us who have been using the system for a while, if you've found yourself frustrated with some of the limitations of the F1.4 in terms of handling and focus performance, then I'd highly recommend you give this lens a try. It has replaced the F1.4 in every way for me. On the other hand, if you have been perfectly happy with the F1.4, the only reason to look at this would be for weather resistance - and only after being very honest with yourself as to if you need it. Both lenses are excellent choices, and every Fuji X photographer should have one of them. Note that I said one - I can't think of any valid reason to have both. If you have some VERY specific use cases, perhaps you do, but you'd already know if you needed both in that case. If you are wondering if you need both and truly aren't sure, then the answer is no.

Una lente de calidad como se espera de Fujifilm, con una excelente apertura y autoenfoque igualmente bueno. Es además ligera y sellada contra la lluvia y el polvo. Muy buena para fotografía espontánea con un toque natural por la distancia de la lente.

العدسة صغيرة بشكل لايصدق اللون الفضي ممتاز وجميل جدا علي الكاميرا السودا بالكامل كنت متخوف لكن اللون متناسق ورائع اهم شيء حجم العدسة صغير بشكل عجيب والاداء لم اجربه كثيرا لكن يبدو انه جيد كما هو متوقع من عدسات البرايم من فوجي الاوتوفوكاس سريع ودقة ممتازة للصور حتي الان ملاحظتي فقط: التركيب ثقيل بعض الشيء لكي تركب علي البودي وتسمع صوت الاغلاق علي مكانها المظبوط، عدسة الزووم كان تركيبها اسهل واخف من كدة بكثير

All the online reviews and YouTube videos are correct, this lens really is excellent! I paired it with an old Fujifilm X Pro 1 and it is an amazing combo, great images, great colours, sharp even at F2 and a silent autofocus make this a lens I cannot see me ever taking off my camera, at a focal length I favour over any other (50mm on an APSC sensor).

First prime I got for my camera. Enjoying it so far!

Came in a good packaging, premium quality and delivered in a day! Very satisfied with everything here!!!