🐟 Elevate your meals with the wild taste of Alaska—because your pantry deserves the best!
Kirkland Signature Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon offers six 6-ounce cans of boneless, skinless, kosher-certified salmon sustainably harvested from Alaska’s pristine waters, delivering premium quality, convenience, and nutrient-rich protein for health-conscious professionals.
A**R
I will be making another purchase soon
The quality is pretty good. It tastes good and it’s easy to make salmon cakes.
L**T
Great tasting, good for you & your heart. How can you go wrong?!
All the Kirkland Signature products I've tried have proved to bevery good and the Kirkland Signature Wild Alaskan Pink Salmondid not disappoint!I made salmon salad, like my tuna salad but with salmon.I sprinkled a little mozzarella on top and nuked it for a minuteturning my open-faced sandwich into a salmon melt. It wasdelicious! FYI: I lightly rinsed it in cold water, like I do all cannedmeat such as Kirkland Signature's Chicken Breast or Albacore Tuna.It didn't have a strong fishy taste nor smell, so you needn't beconcerned with that if it turns you off.Great tasting, good for you and your heart. How can you go wrong?!
S**A
Good salmon. Good for you.
Made salmon patties for dinner last week. Very good.
J**Y
Salmon
If you're worried about the quality of canned salmon, Kirkland is the best, once I discovered this brand, I never used any other canned salmon but Kirkland!!!
M**.
Kirkland versus Henry & Lisa's canned wild salmon comparison: taste and more
I decided to do a taste test on Henry & Lisa's Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon versus Kirkland's Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon. I rarely use canned salmon except in summer, when I'll throw together a salad with HB eggs, perhaps some chickpeas, some Farmers' Market lettuce, and some canned wild salmon. By the time I've finished adding flavor with seasonings, herbs, the lettuce, and a delicious dressing, I don't even notice the taste of canned salmon. I've been buying the Kirkland for years, but decided to try the H&L.Texture: both brands were identical in texture: no bones, cartilage, or skin, which I used to find in some supermarket brands, even TJ's. Taste: almost identical in taste, but H&L had the tiniest bit more salmon flavor. Both had the same degree of saltiness. Both have same ingredients: only salmon and salt. BPA: H&L has the edge with BPA-free cans, whereas Kirkland is silent on BPA. Can: H&L has the edge with a pop-top can opener. Finally, Kirkland has the edge in price: I paid $22.14 for 6 cans a couple of weeks ago, which is $3.69 per can. However, as I write this, the price is $24.35, or $4.06. H&L was $19.16 for 4 cans, which is $4.79 per can, but today is $18.20, which is $4.55 per can.So it's buyer's choice according to what matters most to you: price, convenience, or BPA. I'll probably stick with the H&L because of the BPA-free cans.
B**Y
So delicious
Not only is this product healthy but it is absolutely delicious!
P**.
Salmon
Excellent salmon product, very tasteful. Make a Salmon burger recipe
D**H
Very mild. Great to use in recipes.
I'm not a huge canned salmon fan. I remember the old pink can and the smell that came from it. This is totally different. My hubby made salmon cakes with this and it changed my mind. It is only the salmon meat...not the skin and bones mixed in. It is much milder than the old fashioned version. Great product.
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
1 week ago