Meanplan3 Pcs 304 Stainless Lab Sieves, 200, 80 and 10 Mesh (0.074, 0.18 and 2 Mm) Aperture Test Sieve, 4 Inch Diameter Economy Test Sieve with Labels for Industrial Laboratory

Love this sieve set! They’re about 5” in diameter, a little over 2” high. I do ceramics, and this is great to filter out particulates in the glaze. The different mesh sizes make it easy, and they fit into a large funnel to make things even easier.The screens aren’t the strongest, but if you’re not putting pressure on them, they’ll last you awhile.Note, the sizes on the sides are written in Chinese. But it’s easy to tell the screen size by sight and feel.

I just expected these to be so much bigger. It would be fine if I were sifting powder, but I need something for sifting glass frit and these are 100% useless for that. The only one I might get some use out of is the biggest one, but it's still way too small to do much for me. The quality is fine; I just want to save any other glass artists from wasting time and money like I have.

These shifters worked well to shift the powder and to break up the clumps. Very durable with using my pestle to break up the hard clumps to get them to the right size needed

Horribly made, didn't expect much for the price but the way the metal is bent makes it impossible to use without getting particles stuck in the product. Its suppose to do one thing and it can't.

Really good value for the money. They are well made, perhaps a strange choice of mesh sizes, but that all depends on what you are doing.I will note: The 80 and the 200 look extremely similar to the eye. They are well labeled, but if you find yourself wondering if you got two of the same, you did not. Under a magnification you can see that the weave of the 200 is different from the simple screen weave of the 80 and it is indeed a much finer mesh.Also, they stack well so you can use them as a classifier stack.The only sadness, for which I take off zero stars, is that there isn't one or two between the 10 and the 80. Because I want it all! (I made myself a "window screen" one to go between the 10 and 80 which is easy. Don't over think it. Just a cardstock ring, some tape, and use the structure of the 10 and the 80 for stability.)

The rim on the bottom can be smooth so it does not sit properly.

I fully understand that these are low quality, borderline one time use, but I was even disappointed with that expectation.They work but the seive sizes are strange. One really course and the other two very fine.They work in the sense that a screen is attached to a ring but they are really low quality and very small.

Imagine the letter J. The bottom edge / lip - the inner part catches powder and is difficult to get that powder out. So after the powder progresses through the screen, some of it gets caught in the J edge that runs all the way around the bottom edge. A lousy design failure. Surprised no one else mentions this in the other reviews. If the powder has value, it's a significant waste.