![Inland Empire (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/612NA0lxmJL._AC_SL3840_.jpg)



Desertcart purchases this item on your behalf and handles shipping, customs, and support to Seychelles.
“Strange, what love does.” The role of a lifetime, a Hollywood mystery, a woman in trouble . . . David Lynch’s first digitally shot feature makes visionary use of the medium to weave a vast meditation on the enigmas of time, identity, and cinema itself. Featuring a tour de force performance from Laura Dern as an actor on the edge, this labyrinthine Dream Factory nightmare tumbles down an endless series of unfathomably interconnected rabbit holes as it takes viewers on a hallucinatory odyssey into the deepest realms of the unconscious mind. DIRECTOR-APPROVED TWO-BLU-RAY SPECIAL EDITION FEATURES Review: Fantastic - I managed to catch this film just before it finished its brief run at a local theater here in Chicago, and I'm so glad I made the trip. I can't say that I know what the movie is about, and I have to be honest: I don't care (though I enjoy reading the different perspectives among filmgoers who DO have their ideas on what it's really about). If the purpose of a good film or piece of music is to provoke an emotional response out of the viewer/listener, then "Inland Empire" achieved this in spades, and this makes it a terrific film in my view. I was fully riveted for all three hours and was not bored for one single minute. And it's unlike any film I've ever seen before. I'll concede right away it's not for everyone - but I truly believe it to be something special and really love it. Laura Dern's performance is something else, and I can't think of another well-known American actress who would be bold enough to approach a role like this (though Julianne Moore comes to mind), much less put their trust in Lynch as Dern does here, and has done so before. And though this is in digital video, I still found it to be filmed in a rich kind of way. Not sumptuous like "Mulholland Drive" (probably my favorite Lynch film of all), but still with the same care I believe Lynch puts into any of his films. The use of sound is great too. Also, though I read in a local film review about one scene where "you'll want to scream...you probably will", I was still not prepared for the impact. I actually thought I'd already seen the moment in question, but was I ever wrong! When it did happen, I was frozen in my seat - a really frightening combination of sound and image that's hard to get out of your head. I still think about this movie every day or so - it really stays with you. Again, not for everybody, not by a longshot. But so glad I saw it and look forward to viewing it again at home. Review: You Want Weird? - I like to think of Inland Empire (2006) as a conglomerate of ingredients from all of David Lynch's previous 9 feature length films. Of course, the word is "surreal." In this 3 hour movie that's shot in standard definition digital, we're taken for a wild ride of surrealism, mystery, confusion, paranoia, and all out wonderment. Yes, in typical Lynch fashion, the plot can be hard to follow, but that's okay, because you will reach the point when you forget about trying to follow it closely, and instead enjoy something unlike anything you will ever see. I see similarities with Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me, and especially Mulholland Dr. This is one of those films where the plot is replaced with interesting people/creatures/situations. Laura Dern shines in this film, and gives probably her best performance as an actress. Of course, this got little recognition, because Inland Empire was a very limited release movie. I strangely found myself enjoying every minute of this film, even when the slow parts got even slower, because the atmosphere was brooding and mysterious, and the acting superb. The old saying, "it's so bad that it's good" just might apply to this movie; I want to emphasize the "bad" being a strange and surreal plot that doesn't cater to the mainstream. Consider my analogy as seen through the eyes of a mainstream viewer who eventually "gets on board" with the pure art that is depicted by Lynch. I think this review is getting a little weird, so I think I'll stop! Inland Empire is essential viewing, and a modern masterpiece from the master of the surreal.




| Contributor | David Lynch, Diane Ladd, Grace Zabriskie, Harry Dean Stanton, Ian Abercrombie, Jeremy Irons, Julia Ormond, Justin Theroux, Karolina Gruszka, Laura Dern, Laura Harring, Mary Steenburgen, Naomi Watts, Nastassja Kinski, Peter J. Lucas, Terry Crews, William H. Macy Contributor David Lynch, Diane Ladd, Grace Zabriskie, Harry Dean Stanton, Ian Abercrombie, Jeremy Irons, Julia Ormond, Justin Theroux, Karolina Gruszka, Laura Dern, Laura Harring, Mary Steenburgen, Naomi Watts, Nastassja Kinski, Peter J. Lucas, Terry Crews, William H. Macy See more |
| Customer Reviews | 4.7 out of 5 stars 1,019 Reviews |
| Format | Blu-ray, Subtitled |
| Genre | Mystery & Suspense |
| Language | English |
| Number Of Discs | 2 |
R**S
Fantastic
I managed to catch this film just before it finished its brief run at a local theater here in Chicago, and I'm so glad I made the trip. I can't say that I know what the movie is about, and I have to be honest: I don't care (though I enjoy reading the different perspectives among filmgoers who DO have their ideas on what it's really about). If the purpose of a good film or piece of music is to provoke an emotional response out of the viewer/listener, then "Inland Empire" achieved this in spades, and this makes it a terrific film in my view. I was fully riveted for all three hours and was not bored for one single minute. And it's unlike any film I've ever seen before. I'll concede right away it's not for everyone - but I truly believe it to be something special and really love it. Laura Dern's performance is something else, and I can't think of another well-known American actress who would be bold enough to approach a role like this (though Julianne Moore comes to mind), much less put their trust in Lynch as Dern does here, and has done so before. And though this is in digital video, I still found it to be filmed in a rich kind of way. Not sumptuous like "Mulholland Drive" (probably my favorite Lynch film of all), but still with the same care I believe Lynch puts into any of his films. The use of sound is great too. Also, though I read in a local film review about one scene where "you'll want to scream...you probably will", I was still not prepared for the impact. I actually thought I'd already seen the moment in question, but was I ever wrong! When it did happen, I was frozen in my seat - a really frightening combination of sound and image that's hard to get out of your head. I still think about this movie every day or so - it really stays with you. Again, not for everybody, not by a longshot. But so glad I saw it and look forward to viewing it again at home.
T**7
You Want Weird?
I like to think of Inland Empire (2006) as a conglomerate of ingredients from all of David Lynch's previous 9 feature length films. Of course, the word is "surreal." In this 3 hour movie that's shot in standard definition digital, we're taken for a wild ride of surrealism, mystery, confusion, paranoia, and all out wonderment. Yes, in typical Lynch fashion, the plot can be hard to follow, but that's okay, because you will reach the point when you forget about trying to follow it closely, and instead enjoy something unlike anything you will ever see. I see similarities with Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me, and especially Mulholland Dr. This is one of those films where the plot is replaced with interesting people/creatures/situations. Laura Dern shines in this film, and gives probably her best performance as an actress. Of course, this got little recognition, because Inland Empire was a very limited release movie. I strangely found myself enjoying every minute of this film, even when the slow parts got even slower, because the atmosphere was brooding and mysterious, and the acting superb. The old saying, "it's so bad that it's good" just might apply to this movie; I want to emphasize the "bad" being a strange and surreal plot that doesn't cater to the mainstream. Consider my analogy as seen through the eyes of a mainstream viewer who eventually "gets on board" with the pure art that is depicted by Lynch. I think this review is getting a little weird, so I think I'll stop! Inland Empire is essential viewing, and a modern masterpiece from the master of the surreal.
D**E
Lynchs puzzles are getting deeper, richer, and more enigmatic
First off I have to disagree that this film isnt meant to be understood, that its just meant to wash over you. Granted just watching it cluelessly, as almost everyone does the first time, creates a certain mood. But if you're a human being with curiosity, one simply cannot just passively let it wash over you. You want to know at least how to read the signposts in the film. One cannot expect to understand all the minutae. Even on first viewing you can pick up on some of the larger themes. The film is about the American experience, its a 'remake' of a European film. Obviously the theme here is fairly unmistakeable. This parallel is drawn upon many times in the film. Also one of the main themes is how Hollywood is no longer this ridiculous grinning entertainment machine like it was in the early days of Hollywood. It is now feeding the neurosis of the people consuming its drivel. The frustration in Lynch's work is evident towards the industry. He is almost screaming 'you have all this power to effect positive change in peoples life, yet look at what you're doing to your audience.' The movie is well done, its not for the pedestrian. Its for someone willing to stop and look at the signs. Even though I was frustrated at some points during the first viewing. I can feel it already this film has its hooks in me like every other Lynch film I've seen. The hook is what motivates understanding, I may not get it all but over time it will open up to me like a flower.
D**?
Art imitates life, and makes life better!
Watch very closely the Polish hooker (called "Lost Girl" in the credits) watching the TV in the opening scene, and the events surrounding her throughout the film. How does she get to being in Piotrek/Smithy's arms at the end? I think that she watches a film starring Nikki Grace, which cascades through her consciousness. At the climax, Nikki's performance kills the "phantom" which had been torturing Lost Girl. Thus, released from internal torment, Lost Girl is able to join her husband and son back in the real world with profound gratitude. WE get to watch the amazing process of that film-within-the-film infiltrating through the Lost Girl's mind, and Nikki's character meeting Lost Girl's husband, older relatives, floozie friends, events back in Poland, maybe a guardian angel or two, and other memories along the way. I regard this as David Lynch's manifesto about the power of art, and specifically acting, to change people for the better. In the end, Nikki's performance receives applause for killing the phantom and replacing the "Rabbits" nonsense in Room 47 (a metaphor for Lost Girl's soul, perhaps?). Nikki then takes her place in Lost Girl's fully processed memories, along with other movie heroines (Laura Harring's femme fatale from Mulholland Dr. is there). Nina Simone and some African-influenced dancers joyfully play us out. The greatest trick of this film is how experiencing it is subjectively very much like the Lost Girl's encounter with On High in Blue Tomorrows, the film within the film. The tension and fear that get built up are unbearable in some scenes, and the frights are very startling (even though being extremely cheaply staged). Then afterward, INLAND EMPIRE unfolds in our minds for days. We replay it. By some alchemical process, once we've processed it for ourselves, we are elated, and maybe enlightened, or so I think this is Lynch's sincere hope and purpose. David Lynch: You have to make another film, buddy, before all those cancer sticks get to you.
D**N
Phenomenal Film by one of the best
Packaged so beautifully, they really did it right for Mr.Lynch with this release <3 the only thing that im bummed over about this, is why didn't they include Rabbits? They've got Lynch One and Two, More Things That Happened, and Ballerina (so great that it was included here loved that lil surprise) BUT NO RABBITS WHAT!!
U**K
Eternal Recurrence and The Karmic Wheel of Time
Some very interesting theories in the Discussions Section on this film. Which is what prompted this review. Finally, for me at least, a cohesive and coherent Lynch film. **************SPOILER************** Detailed metaphors, symbols, and Mcguffins (or my lack of catching all the symbolism) aside, here's what I took away from this film upon my initial viewing: The film is simply about a woman forced to relive her brutal murder over and over again under the theory of eternal recurrence for her egotistical karma and harmful infidelities. (Eternal recurrence is an archaic and Nietzschean concept. Woody Allen made a joke about this theory in HANNAH AND HER SISTERS. "Great, now I'll have to sit through the Ice Capades again.") Allow me to preface my theory about this film by saying: from what we have learned from ancient Eastern thought and physics, time is not a linear event. The concept of time is temporal and subjective. It is possible that multiple timelines may co-exist as a singular event. In "eternal recurrence," the same existence or life is played out over and over again thru time. In Hindu religions it's expressed as the Wheel of Time. Nikki Grace is trapped by her karma or by The Karmic Wheel of Time. According to Eastern doctrines, we all are. Birth, death, and rebirth. Samsara. The only escape according to some Eastern philosophies is thru enlightenment, by paying for that karma ("a past-due bill"), or by altering it. Or, by some other Lynchean shift in consciousness. The Phantom, or Crimp, represents Nikki's "animus" (The masculine inner personality of a female in Jungian psychology.) or her evil karma. Nikki is warned of her Phantom personality or karma by the old gypsy woman at the beginning, "evil was born and followed the boy." Only when Nikki finally kills the Phantom, or her adulterous evil twin, can she free herself from her eternal karma. Free herself from the endless cycle of birth and death. Become enlightened. The Crying Girl (credited as The Lost Girl) represents Nikki in her latest incarnation on The Karmic Wheel of Time, watching her karma and her numerous nightmare lives unfold on TV right before her eyes. The death of The Phantom, or the cleansing of her filthy karma, frees Nikki from the trappings of time and ego, while also freeing Nikki in her current incarnation as The Crying Girl. She has broken her evil karma which allows her, as The Crying Girl, to finally achieve marital bliss, children, and karmic happiness. By the end, Nikki has changed her karma. That's it, in a Lynchean nutshell. (During my second viewing of the film, I realized that Nikki initiates her evil karma in a past life by murdering her husband and his lover, for which she must suffer karmic payment for her own infidelities by being murdered in a similar fashion during future incarnations.) ******************************** Certainly valid, if one considers Lynch's adherence to Eastern Vedic thought, philosophy, and meditation. Lynch even quotes the Upanishads in the DVD extras. The Rabbits are the coolest concept Lynch has come up with in a very long time. Awesome and hypnotic. Like a Magritte painting. Mind blowing to say the least. Would love to see this flick on shrooms. To me, the Rabbits represent the karmic materialistic trappings of ego. Samsara. Or, eternal Hell on Earth. If only Lynch had had the temerity to linger on the static images of them for a much longer time in the film. They are macabre. (You can find some 6 to 8 minute episodes on YouTube. Unfortunately, they were not included on the Bonus Disc.) Everyone else's interpretation about this film and the Rabbits is wholly valid. What a cool flick. My hope is that, after spending more time with it, I may see it as a Masterpiece. Not being a fan of MD or LH by any means, I had given up on Lynch. (The only reason I rented IE is because I was intrigued by the trailer.) So, I have no idea how this narrative is applied to MD. In my opinion this is his best film since WAH and FWWM. Even though I understand the aesthetic that Lynch was going for with this piece, I only wish he would have used real film, maybe a better digital camera, or brought the film more into focus. I also wish he had used better ambient lighting in certain shots. This film was far too dark in places when it wasn't necessary. The soft dirty focus, vignetting, and fisheyed close-ups were a distraction at times, and played a large part in almost annihilating my full enjoyment of this film. IMO, this was an unnecessary device to exhibit Lynchean dreamtime. However, I may change my opinions about this after subsequent viewings. My theory is that the entire narrative takes place in dreamtime. (Parts of the film were too grounded in reality for dream narrative. I actually wish it had been a little bit more cryptic.) For the entire film to be in soft focus to simulate dreamtime, puts a very big demand upon a modern viewer. I feel that his use of music and his Lynchean set pieces are all that are ever needed to present his inner dreamworlds. However, it is his painting, not mine. (The scratchy phonograph needle that was used to represent one of Nikki's past lives was a nice touch.) I do love the raw grainy look of old film. It's like dragging a dry oil paint brush across a canvas so that the texture of the painting surface shows thru. But, I feel that it's very easy to get carried away with the newer medium of digital tape. Unfortunately, Lynch says he'll never use real film again. Too bad. :( Aside from being a dreamscape, comparisons to ERASERHEAD are baffling to me. This piece wasn't quite on the same level as ERASERHEAD (is anything?), but it is a very fine Lynch film, none the less. Past reviewers that complained about the "editorial sloppiness" are way off base about this film. IMO, every scene is crucial to the narrative. Nothing was extraneous. (As a matter of fact, I felt that a few scenes adding more clues about The Phantom were needed.) The film is ponderous at times for the average viewer, but the 3 hour running time moved by very quickly for me. All of the music cues Lynch utilized for this piece were excellent, including his own compositions. I'm especially partial to his ambient music and The Rabbits' theme. Most excellent. Everything you've heard is right on the money, Laura Dern IS truly amazing in this. A very giving performance. (In some of her scenes, she looks so much like her mother Diane Ladd, it's eerie.) INLAND EMPIRE indeed. The DVD extras are great. Over an hour of extra footage, most of which was not necessary to the narrative and was rightly cut. His interview is shorter than the one on the ERASERHEAD DVD, but he seemed more prepared and relaxed in this interview. I love his thoughts on music and the importance of proper theater and home theater equipment for the purpose of achieving the full intent of the artist's vision during playback. (One of my pet peeves are friends that insist on watching films on computer monitors.) Lynch goes off on people that watch films on computers and cell phones. He gets angry and very sad by the use of technology and its trend towards the "putrification" of this artform. (Lynch, I feel your pain, man.) Watching him work behind the scenes was very cool. Because his signature technique is mood, I've always had the feeling that Lynch was very meticulous and demanding in his direction to his actors, and it shows here. "Anyone need some Fixall?" Great stuff! Now, if we could just get Lynch to film a true biography on Francis Bacon, everything would be right with the world. Or, at least right with the Lynchean Universe. Signed, An ex-Lynchead that is intrigued by Lynch again.
A**S
The Blood Of A Poet, This Time Lynch's
I was at first shocked when I was hearing and reading from Lynch fans negative feedback. It took me a while to understand what had turned so many otherwise open-minded viewers off. This film, though thematically most linked to Mullholland Drive, is stylistically a culmination of what has attracted Lynch fans all along. Take Lost Highway, with the inexplicably changing 'incarnations' and the two women played by the same actress. And at how many levels is Laura Dern playing her role? It would actually be quite a task to periodize the manifestations of Laura Dern's shifting realities and identities, yet there is a cohesive thread. As for a read? Well I don't presume any Lynch fan wants to be able to walk away with some cliched abstraction that is supposed to be the meaning of the movie. I do not find the movie any harder to engage than Eraserhead. In fact, I find Inland Empire much easier to engage. However, Laura Dern's descent is quick, and one would be hard pressed to convince me that it is not a descent. To where does she descend? Where else but that most feared place of psychic horror that despite our 'enlightened' sensibilities, we cannot brush aside. In short, two things make this film 'hard' to watch, both of which depend upon the viewer: 1. the thematic, emotional, and visual darkness of the film. 2. the realities within realities within realities. But it's like I wrote about Eraserhead: Lynch is by far the closest thing we've got to a filmaker-poet since Cocteau precisely because he is willing to make the conception of a cohesive plot (narrative) impossible. This is definitely a masterpiece for me, even amongst the other works of Lynch. In a away I'm not surprised about the negative responses. But I'm just as surprised that the audience that was glad to be horrified and removed from the mundane by virtue of shifting realities in Eraserhead, the film upon which Lynch was able to build a career, cannot accept an equally ambitious (and ambiguous) and daring film. One thing that's missing: where are the people that are really excited about this film? I'm sure there are some, but I haven't met any. Some fans haven't even bothered to watch it.
C**A
Intriguing
Disturbing and interesting at the same time. You can’t stop watching although you want to.
J**N
Lynchian
Very dreamy, several great idea's at work here, and some bad scenes too.
R**D
Experimento radical de David Lynch
"Inland Empire" es, casi con toda probabilidad, la película de David Lynch más radical y personal del director norteamericano. Con reminiscencias de otros filmes anteriores del director, tales como: "Mulholland Drive" o "Lost Highway", estamos ante la obra cinematográfica definitiva de Lynch, en la cual hace uso de sus temas y obsesiones recurrentes sin límites. Este Blu-ray es la edición importada de UK (ASIN: B0039LAPWK); no contiene subtítulos (tan solo, en inglés, para ciertas escenas de la película donde se habla polaco). La imagen, en mi opinión, es muy buena aunque en ciertas páginas especializadas han criticado su calidad diciendo que no es superior a las ediciones existentes en DVD (argumentando que "Inland Empire" fue filmada en formato digital con resolución estándar). Personalmente, no he podido comprobar esta cuestión pues no dispongo de ninguna edición en DVD de la película para poder realizar la comparación. El sonido (inglés Pcm 2.0 ó DTS-HD MA 5.1) es, en su versión DTS-HD MA 5.1, excelente sin ser de referencia, haciendo un profuso uso del subwoofer a lo largo de todo el metraje y una excelente utilización de los altavoces frontales. El uso de los altavoces traseros es mínimo y en contadas ocasiones. Por lo tanto, siempre y cuando no te importe la carencia de subtítulos en inglés o español para realizar el visionado de la película, este Blu-ray es el medio ideal, por su calidad de audio y vídeo, para disfrutar de "Inland Empire".
G**L
Un sueño
La película más intrigante de Lynch, me gusta mucho pero no es para todos. Ojo, al ser una edición Criterion, no cuenta con subtítulos en español, para que lo tomen en cuenta
E**L
La trahison des images
*** Mehr Interpretation als Rezension, entsprechend sei hiermit vor Spoilern gewarnt *** Der Verrat der Bilder 'Der Verrat der Bilder' ist eines der ganz großen Bilder des Surrealismus, es ist ein Schlüsselwerk in dem Wandel von der Modernen zur Postmodernen Malerei. René Magritte durchbrach mit dem Bild(ern, besser noch kam die Idee in Les deux mystères zur Geltung) gleich mehrere Ebenen zwischen Künstler, Werk und Rezipient. Neben der offensichtlichen Erkenntnis, dass ein Bild stets ein Bild ist und ein noch so natürlich abgebildetes Objekt eben nicht zu dem Objekt selbst wird. Andererseits zerschlägt Magritte auch die Ebene der Identifikation über Sprache. Wenn das Abgebildete nicht das abbildet was es abbildet, was bildet es dann ab? Wenn also die Pfeife keine Pfeife darstellt, was stellt sie dann dar? Die Wirklichkeit zerfällt damit und wird absolut subjektiv. Eine Interpretation wird unmöglich, das das was da abgebildet ist KEINE Pfeife ist. Die Bilder täuschen Ein Kunstgriff dessen sich Lynch nun bedient indem er mehrere Filmebenen einführt Der Film 'Inland Empire' (1) handelt von den Dreharbeiten zu "On High in Blue Tomorrows" (2), der Nikkis (Laura Dern) großer Comback werden soll. "On High in Blue Tomorrows" entpuppt sich dabei als Remake des tragisch durch den Tod der Hauptdarsteller gescheiterten "4-7" (3). Unterdessen wird die filmische Erzählung von einer jungen Prostituierten eingeleietet die sich eine Hasen-Sidcom im Hotelfernsehen anschaut(4). Die immer wieder eingespielten Hasenepisoden sind sehr ruhig fast stagnierend, aber dabei stets von einem bedrohlichen Unterton der sinnentleerten Dialoge, des dröhnenden Hintergrundklangs und der völlig zusammenhangslos eingespielten Konservenlacher. Die Ebene der Hauptrollen und Hauptfiguren löst sich derweil auf Sue/Nikki (mir fehlt hier eigentlich ein Augenblick in dem sie noch mit Laura angesprochen wird) sind beide mit dem gleichen eifer- und rachsüchtigen Mann Piotrek Krol (Der Nachname ist eine Anspielung auf Kaninchen) gespielt von Peter J. Lucas verheiratet. Sie beginnen beide eine Affäre. Das Ausmaß an Rückgriffen und Überschlägen von Film zu Film zu Film zu Film zu Film ist dabei so undurchsichtig, dass man sich eine Zeichnung anlegen müsste um die unterschiedlichen Handlungsstränge und -ebenen, die derweil noch aggressiv ineinandergreifen aufzuschlüsseln. Stellt sich allerdings die Frage ob das nötig ist? Ist es nicht. Dies ist keine Pfeife Inland Empire ist kein regulärer handlungsbasierter linearer Film. Mehr noch als bei Lost Highway und Mulholland Drive ist Inland Empire eine Psychogram über Ängste, Schuldgefühle, Innere Zerrissenheit und Wut. Lynch fertigte kein normales Drehbuch an, er schrieb die Szenen einzeln direkt vor den Dreharbeiten und fragmentierte den Dreh und verhinderte das Entstehen einer eindeutigen Handlung, weder die Schauspieler noch er selbst wussten genau wohin die Reise geht. Zumindest wenn es dabei um die Handlungsebene geht blieb diese hier sehr weit außen vor. Sie war Lynch nicht wichtig. Anfang und Ende sind hier klar als emotionale Zustände der Hauptfigur auszumachen. Die Anfangs unsichere und ängstliche Nikki geht durch eine Reihe von Tiefpunkten bis hin zu Depersonalisation und Persönlichkeitsabspaltungen um am Ende Glücklich zu sich zu finden. So zerbrochen und zerschlagen der Film auf die Zuschauer wirkt, so zerbrochen und zerschlagen ist Nikkis psychosoziale Verfassung. Die immer wieder auftauchenden Prostituierten, der im Hotelzimmer mit bzw. um Nikki/Sue diskutierende Chor, Sue, die Hasen, all das ist Nikkis Innenleben auf der Suche nach einem stabilen Selbst. Das der Film (Inland Empire) dabei von einer weinenden Prostituierten intoniert wird, markiert den emotionalen Punkt von welchem die Handlung beginnt. Nikki ist nicht nur Verzweifelt, sie fühlt sich ausgenutzt, missbraucht, verlassen, einsam und gequält. Ihr Selbstwert ist dahin. So kann man diesen Film und alle Filme in diesem Film vielleicht nicht verstehen, aber sicher erfühlen. Während Lost Highway und Mulholland Drive noch Anfang und Ende und mit ein wenig analytischen Gespür auch eine klare Handlung besitzen, besitzt Inland Empire zwar ein Ende und verweist auf viele kleine Stationen die zu diesem Ende führ(t)en, aber keine klare Handlung mehr. Es geht hier nur noch um das Gefühl und um die Tiefe Verzweiflung. An diesem Punkt ist Inland Empire die Konsequenz aus Lynchs surrealsten Filmen (Eraserhead, Lost Highway, Mulholland Drive) und die Klimax seiner Erzählkunst. So verwundert es vielleicht auch nicht, dass Lynch hier -ganz Post-Moderne- immer wieder auf sich selbst und sein Œuvre verweist. Von der Schauspielerwahl (Laura Dern) über die Musik (Blue Velvet, Twin Peaks) zu unterschiedlichsten Film- und Serienfiguren oder -settings die angedeutet werden. Alles in allem nimmt Lynch sich mit diesem Film auch die Möglichkeit sein eigenes Werk und seine Bedeutung in der Filmbranche zu reflektieren. Dass dabei die große Halle, die immer wieder im Film auftaucht und die den Raum für unterschiedlichste Darbietungen von Gefühlen dient die Halle seines Hauses ist, mag dem Budget geschuldet sein, scheint aber nicht gerade Bar jeder Ironie: Hollywood sieh her! Dies ist die Zukunft des Films. Lynch zumindest war und ist davon überzeugt, dass er besonders in der Herangehensweise des intuitiven Drehbuchs und der locker sitzenden DV-Cam ein zukunftsweisendes Werk geschaffen hat. Ob das nun Hybris oder die Wahrheit ist, entscheidet letztendlich jeder für sich selbst. Blockbustertauglich erscheint beides auf den ersten Blick allerdings nicht. Das Lynch aber durch die Lande reiste und große Teile seines Privatvermögens investierte um Laura Dern eine Nominierung für den Oscar zu ermöglichen, woran er allerdings ohne großes Studio im Nacken scheiterte, zeigt vielleicht wie überzeugt er selbst von seinem Film und seinen Schauspielern war. Natürlich liebt Lynch seine Akteure, er liebt ausdrucksstarke Gesichter die sich bis zum clownesken Verzerren lassen, er liebt ganz bewusst eingesetztes Overacting, er liebt das Drama und das große Bild. Er liebt diese Dinge so sehr, dass man sich fragen kann warum Lynch überhaupt noch mit Dialogen dreht und nicht surreale Stummfilme mit Texttafeln und radikal-expressiv bis surrealer Musik unterlegt. Von dieser Warte aus muss man ihm vielleicht entgegenhalten, dass sein Werk mit Sicherheit Post-Modern und mit Sicherheit auch Radikal ist, aber es ist eben auch Anachronistisch. Es ist eher die post-moderne Fortführung einer in den USA fast schon vergessenen Filmtechnik. Anders sieht es hingegen in Asien aus, der japanische Film strotzt nur so von ähnlichen Ideen. Hier wird Lynchs Werk, wie schon das Werk der Surrealisten zu einem Schlüsselmoment der Kunst selbst. Absoluter Realität "Ich glaube an die künftige Auflösung dieser scheinbar so gegensätzlichen Zustände von Traum und Wirklichkeit in einer Art absoluter Realität, wenn man so sagen kann: Surrealität. Nach ihrer Eroberung strebe ich, sicher, sie nicht zu erreichen, zu unbekümmert jedoch um meinen Tod, um nicht zumindest die Freuden eines solchen Besitzes abzuwägen" Andre Breton Im zweite Satz des Breton-Zitats liegt der wahre Schlüssel um den Surrealismus als Bindeglied zwischen Moderner (Psychoanalyse) und Post-Moderner (Lyotard) zu verstehen. "sicher, sie nicht zu erreichen" die Idee ist von Beginn an zum scheitern verurteilt, Traum und Wirklichkeit prallen aufeinander und lassen sich schon an jenem Punkt an welchem man versucht die Wirklichkeit zu definieren nicht zusammenbringen. Die Surrealität verharrt dadurch in der Darstellung des Traums, des Gefühls, des Unterbewussten, nur gelegentlich gespickt mit Verweisen auf das subjektiv Reale, dass vermeintlich in einem Sinnzusammenhang von Irrealem und Realem steht. Diesen Sinnzusammenhang ließ Lynch in seinen früheren Werken stets noch mehr als hier erahnen. Die Abtreibung in Eraserhead, der Mord in Lost Highway oder die verschmähte Liebe in Mulholland Drive. Auch in Inland Empire werden die Ursachen für Nikkis Ängste herausgearbeitet, aber mehr als in seinen früheren Werken nähert sich Lynch hier der traumhaften Darstellung an ohne viel Auflösung anzubieten. In einem Sammelsurium aus Gefühlsfacetten sind es keine katharisch von Schuld reinigenden Visionen des Szenarios "Vater siehst Du nicht, dass ich brenne". Inland Empire greift viel tiefer und dabei in eine weit weniger extreme emotionale Stressphase ein. Hier sind nicht Todesstrafe oder Suizid als ein zentraler Augenblick auszumachen, hier reinigt sich die Hauptfigur langsam von den Schatten ihrer Selbst. Ob man sich die drei Stunden derweil mehrfach ansehen mag um diesen schweren Prozess zu begleiten, dass sei jedem selbst frei gestellt. Allerdings in der Darbietung der von Breton angemahnten absoluten Realität als Bindeglied zwischen Unterbewusstsein und Bewusstsein nähert sich Inland Empire dieser wohl nebst Eraserhead am stärksten. (K)Eine (Handlungs)Analyse Lynch selbst kommentierte sein Werk wie folgt: "Die meisten Filme sind ganz einfach zu verstehen. Aber ich erzähle nicht bloß Geschichten, sondern arbeite mit Abstraktionen. Das Kino kann die Zuschauer in eine Welt jenseits des Intellekts entführen, in der sie sich ganz und gar ihren eigenen Intuitionen anvertrauen müssen. Es geht nicht darum, etwas zu verstehen, sondern darum, etwas zu erfahren."(Im Spiegelinterview) Sein Entwurf für den Umgang mit Inland Empire, sowie mit seinen vorherigen abstrahierenden Filmen zerreißt die Erwartungshaltung eines Teils seines Publikums. Diejenigen die wie Puzzlekönige wieder und wieder vor Lynchfilmen saßen und die Filme wie gigantische Kopfnüsse zu knacken suchten stehen nun vor einem unlösbaren Enigma. Aber es gibt dennoch ein Kernthema in diesem Film, dass wenn auch nicht direkt gezeigt so doch zentral in diesem Spinnennetz aus Eindrücken liegt. Hier ist der Ehebruch das Bindeglied auf welchen sich alle noch so kleinen Facetten des Films beziehen lassen. Nikki sieht durch ein in ihre Unterwäsche gebranntes Loch in die Zukunft. Noch offensichtlicher Symbole kann man kaum noch bemühen um darauf hinzuweisen, dass hier Sexualität als Ursache für Destruktion aber die Destruktion auch als Chance begriffen werden kann. Es tauchen immer wieder Prostituierte auf, die mal schwach und zerschlagen, mal stark und selbstbewusst in Erscheinung treten. Auch hier wird wieder die Rolle der Frau ausgehend von einer Definition über ihre Sexualität, denn eine Prostituierte wird als solche über die Sexualität definiert. Soweit wird das inhaltliche Konzept des Films schon wie Lynch sagt erfahren und im gleichen Spiegelinterview merkte er etwas dazu an, dass am prophetisch als Wert des Films sehen kann: "Ich glaube aber, die Zuschauer verstehen von "Inland Empire" viel mehr, als sie selber ahnen." Ja, vermutlich. Die allesentscheidende Frage scheint dabei zu sein, ob sich die Zuschauer auf das verstandene als Film einlassen wollen. Hier versagt die klassische Werkanalyse, hier versagt die Suche nach der linearen Handlung, hier geht es nur noch um die Fragen "Wer bin ich?", "Wer möchte ich sein?" und besonders "Was bin ich mir selbst wert?" von einer Frau gestellt die aus einer kaputten Beziehung mit einem eifer- und rachsüchtigen Mann, wahrscheinlich auch einem äußerst gewalttätigen Mann sich in den Ehebruch flüchtete und (vorerst) nicht in die Trennung. "Die Frau in Schwierigkeiten", ist am Anfang des Films noch zu weit von sich selbst entfernt um selbstbewusst und allein auf sich gestellt ihrer Wege zu gehen. Erst am Ende des Films kehrt Harmonie und damit Identität ein. Das Über-Ich (Konvention) und das Es (Emotion/Trieb) finden zueinander und Inland Empire schließt anders als Lynchs andere Filme absolut versöhnlich.
J**H
Beautiful
Perfection
Trustpilot
3 days ago
2 months ago