A Nice Little Place on the North Side: Wrigley Field at One Hundred

Watching a baseball game at Wrigley’s Field is a delight. In 2011, I took the train from Michigan to Chicago, then took the Red Line out to Wrigley Field to watch the Houston Astros beat the Chicago Cubs. I was rooting for the Cubs and would have liked to have seen them win, but those who go to watch baseball at Wrigley’s attend mostly for the experience. “People go to museums of fine art to see the paintings, not the frames that display them,” Will writes. “Many people do, however, decide to go to Chicago Cubs games because they are played within this lovely frame… It is frequently noted that Wrigley’s Field is lovelier than the baseball that is played on the field.” (13). This leads to all kinds of jokes about the Cubs: “What does a female bear taking birth control pills have in common with the World Series,” someone will ask. “No Cubs.” Or, “for most teams, 0-30 is called a calamity. For the Cubs, it is called April. (29) The old ballpark turned 100 years old in 2014 and George Will, who grew up in Illinois and is a Cub fan, wrote a history of the park to celebrate the event and to explore why people love the Cubs and Wrigley’s Field. As Will notes early in the book, "Reason rarely regulates love." (11) And with the Cubs, it’s all about love as their attendance is the least sensitive to performance in all baseball. (134) People come whether or not they are winning. Ironically, their attendance is four times more sensitive to beer prices than performance which is why only two teams (the Pirates and Diamondbacks) have cheaper beer. (136) The Cubs are an old organization and at one time (pre-Wrigley’s Field) they were a powerhouse. In the 1880s, with Cap Anson, they had many championships. It’s just that they’ve had a bad century, winning their last World Series in 1908. Will gives the history of the team that was first known as the Chicago White Stockings and under the leadership of Albert Goodwill Spaulding (baseball’s first entrepreneur) helped invent Major League Baseball. (31). Goodyear published yearly “Spalding Guides” to Major League Baseball. In his 1908 edition, Goodyear (who Will noted “was not always fastidious about facts”) created the myth of Abner Doubleday inventing baseball in the summer of 1939 in Farmer Finney’s pasture in Cooperstown, NY. (33) After being known as the White Stockings, the team went by a number of names (Colts, Orphans and Spuds). In 1902, after the creation of the American League, there was another team in Chicago that was using the name “White Sox’s,” so they looked for a new name and decided on Cubs as it represented bear-like strength with a playful disposition. (36) Another interesting fact that Will provides: The American League was founded in 1882 and its main difference at the time was it allowed beer sale at ball games. (34) In 1914, the Cubs built their new stadium with the home plate at the corner of Addison and Clark Streets at the site of a former Lutheran Seminary. (20) Ironically, Addison Street was named for Dr. Thomas Addison, who identified "Addison anemia," providing more comic material for the Cubs. (15) Two years later, William Wrigley, who had made his fortune with chewing gum, brought into the Cub organization. (45). Wrigley was a promoter who was fond of saying, "Baseball is too much of a sport to be a business and too much of a business to be a sport. (46) His was the first club to allow people to keep balls that were hit into the stands and unlike other teams, who saw radio broadcast as a threat, he allowed stations to broadcast the games free of charge. (47-48). He reached out to women and built a strong female fan base. Under his family leadership, the motto was if the team was bad, “strive mightily to improve the ballpark.” (87) The Wrigley’s tried to create a ballpark for the whole family and would advertise for people to come out and have a picnic. The joke was that the other team often did. (83) Will goes into detail about the Cub’s 1932 World Series loss to the Yankees and the game when Babe Ruth “called the shot” before he hit a home run over center field. As he notes, it probably didn’t happen the way it has been portrayed. Ruth, and the Yankees, were upset with the Cubs over a player (Mark Koenig) they’d traded from the Yankees late in the season. The team decided that Koenig would only get ½ of a share of the World’s Series proceeds for the team since he didn’t play all year for them. This increased the tension between the teams and most likely Ruth’s pointing the bat at the Cub’s dugout. The game was also interesting because of who were in the stands. Franklin Roosevelt was there (just 38 days before being elected President along with a 12 year old boy (John Paul Stevens) who would go on to be a Supreme Court Justice. (55-6) Will tells many other stories about the Cubs and the field. This includes providing the background to the book and movie, The Natural. (65-67); how Jack Ruby was a vendor at Wrigley’s before moving to Texas where he shot Lee Harvey Oswald (90); of Ray Kroc selling paper cups to Wrigley’s before starting McDonalds (91); and Ronald Reagan broadcasting Cub games in Iowa via teletype. (93). Wrigley’s field was the last major league ballpark to install lights. Will notes that one of the reason was the local bars, who liked day games so that the fans would stop off at the bar for drinks and food after the game was over. It is also one of the few stadiums to hold on to the organ and to shun more electronic means of music and scoreboards. Other topics that Will covered included race relations and baseball in Chicago. Some of the earlier leaders of the team were racists, which is ironic since the most famous Cub was Ernie Banks, an African-American. Another famous Cub was Manager Leo Durocher, known for saying “nice guys finish last.” This is another myth that Will shatters, noting that Durocher was speaking of the Giants and said, “All nice guys. They’ll finish last” and journals “improved on his quote.” (108) He also noted that Durocher didn’t like Ernie Banks. “You could say about Ernie that he never remembered a sign or forgot a newspaperman’s name,” Durocher said. (112) The last part of the book is mostly philosophical as Will explores the role tribalism plays into our love of sports, the beauty of which “is its absence of meaning.” (188) I don’t always agree with George Will’s politics, but I share a love of baseball and enjoyed reading this book. If you don’t mind Will’s myth-busting, you’ll find this book to be a gem.

Engaging and chocked full of interesting history and anecdotes pertaining to Wrigley and the Cubs. The book also takes ample time to philosophize on the meaning of baseball and life through the lens of the Cubs and their iconic stomping grounds. A breezy read that I'd recommend to any Cubs fan and anyone interested in baseball history.

I really enjoyed the book and knocked it off during my lunch break over a couple of weeks. It is a collection of stories and ruminations and can be read in pieces so it would be a great vacation, beach or break book. What I'm not sure about is whether the average reader would also find it enjoyable. I confess; I have been to Wrigley Field a number of times and follow the Cubs from my years living near Chicago though I am really a Giants fan since boyhood watching Willie Mays. I love the whole Wrigley ambience so I'm not a neutral observer.I will say that a non-baseball fan would probably not find this book of any interest. And for those of you who haven't (yet) taken in a game in the "friendly confines", I heartily recommend it. As the author George Will notes, Wrigley Field is such a great experience that many new parks (Baltimore and SF to name a few) have tried to copy it. But when I compare getting off work early with a couple of friends, driving to Wrigley in our scrubs, parking on some guy's lawn for 5 or 10 bucks and then getting decent seats where you are close enough to yell at a player on the field and see him flinch with places like Oakland's coliseum sitting in the outfield upper deck and needing binoculars to see home plate, Wrigley wins hands down.In many places in this book, I found myself giggling eating lunch. And I loved the whole rant about how bad cubs fans are. There were a few places where I skimmed, like the part about being a Cub's fan might or might not damage your brain quoting a book written by a couple of doctors with too much time and beer on their hands. But over all, I really enjoyed this book that didn't take itself too seriously.

I lived in Chicago for many years in my late 20s and early 30s. I lived blocks from Wrigley and was able to see many games there. I found the book to be very interesting in many respects. However, George Will is a very cognitive writer and tries to portray his story from an elitist point of view. With that said, he is a life-long Cubs fan and did a great job painting a vivid picture of the history of the field, how the neighborhood of Lakeview has evolved since 1914, and even points out some incredibly interesting facts about well-known historical figures being employed at the Friendly Confines. The book does a great job explaining why the Cubs are losers, why they have always been losers, and why they'll continue that losing tradition---because of where they play. When he describes how beer is the single most contributing factor to the stadiums' success, he delivers a message that Wrigley is about the people, not the product on the field. As a Cubs fan, Will is very objective and writes with an almost sad point of view of the underwhelming success of his team. If you're a Cubs fan, a citizen of Chicago or a lover of baseball or history, this book is a great read; it's short, to the point, and delivers some great points of view on one of sports' legendary locations. I would highly recommend picking it up. And if you haven't visited Wrigley Field to see an afternoon game in the height of summer, then you're missing out!

Very entertainjing book. Great read.

great little read

This was a gift for my brother, an avid Cubs fan. He loved it!

If Wrigley Field was not on my bucket list before, it is now.