Infinite Reality: Avatars, Eternal Life, New Worlds, and the Dawn of the Virtual Revolution

Have been finding the philosophical and theological implications of avatars intriguing of late, and so picked up Infinite Reality: Avatars, Eternal Life, New Worlds, and the Dawn of the Virtual Revolution a couple of weeks ago and read it yesterday. The book both is, and is not, what I had anticipated.It is not, by and large, a detailed exploration of the science of avatars and virtual worlds. I was hoping for a kind of lay person's introduction to the coding and constructing of such worlds--this is not a book about that.What it is, however, is a big picture analysis of the burgeoning field of social science research into the experience of having and using avatars in virtual worlds. For all it's current caché, social science research into this area is still actually quite new. So a book length survey of the field is welcome.However, my biggest surprise in reading the book was the author's intentional pushing back on the notion of "virtual" as opposed to the real. Their point is that all reality is actually mediated, and so what we call reality, and what we call virtual, are somewhat false distinctions.Here are two examples that illustrate the point. First, in a virtual world, if someone wearing simulator equipment is asked to walk across a narrow board straddling a deep valley, most users of the technology will experience everything someone would experience in the "real" world--sweaty palms, vertigo, fear, etc. Some people in virtual worlds simply won't do it. In this case, what is virtual is experienced as real. The brain and sense organs quickly make a switch so that the mediated world simply IS the world.Or take for example your most recent phone conversation. If you reported that conversation to me, you wouldn't say, "I just talked to a digital reproduction of Gary's voice on a telephone device." Instead, you'd say, "I just got done talking to Gary." The mediated, virtual voice becomes, through habit of use, the real voice, and the intervening media elides.Much of this book is devoted to reducing the bar on what counts as a virtual device, and pointing out that very soon virtual devices will be able to reproduce sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell with such a high degree of precision, especially as regards tracking, that when we use them, we won't feel like we're in a virtual world. We'll just experience ourselves as really being there.I welcome this philosophical and social science approach to the use of avatars and virtual worlds. I still wish the book would have lived up to its title more, with a deeper exploration of the theological implications of eternal life in virtual worlds, and the science and technology used in this new virtual revolution.The book will especially benefit readers hoping to reconceive what and how virtual experiences are in relation to the real.

I accessed this book, on the face value of its topic, with "infinite" expectations: what more thrilling than never ending "reality" out there possibly can be? I was somewhat disappointed. Now I am trying to figure out where the mistake was. Was it me? I expected a roller coaster ride with a lot of acceleration, steep learning curve, even some vomit from dizzying heights of soaring trans-human understanding when it plunges into depths of insight.It read to me like a textbook: pedestrian. Lazy tempo with picture blur at the edges: who can be comprehensive... and remain sharp, concise and incisive!? The part where standard psychological experiments were replicated was textbook one to one. The teaching point: virtual reality is exactly like the ordinary one. The redeeming grace was you heard it from the source. The authors did most of the reported experiments themselves. Impressive but not immersive. It looks like I know most of the subject matter already and only scar singly here and there some more intriguing details are being added.The second part of the grand design of the book was general philosophical cogitations. It goes something like this: If virtual reality is exactly like the ordinary one - you are actually not sure what the ordinary one is.The book is most definitely for a broad general audience. Knowing little about the subject beforehand is an advantage. But...are there still such people, in this time and age?Virtual, yes: but I agree with Denys Yeo, where we lost the Infinity??Afterthoughts:....hmm....re-reading all the reviews above (I ordered the book because of Jeff Hancock's review - it feels, strangely, I wrote a "mirror review" to his: stating similar points with opposite valuation) all of them with five or four stars...it looks like there are many. Probably it was my own background in social science that prevented me from seeing the smorgasbord of insights as new and fresh [to me]. To illustrate what I mean by a roller coaster ride of a book on - alternative, virtual or otherwise - reality, I would warmly recommend a classic in the field of Sociology: The Social Construction of Reality by authors Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckman. [Do not be deterred by the year of publication in 1967 - it is still very fresh] If you really wish for a ground-shaker, go for Lila by Robert M. Pirsig and figure out his "dynamic quality." Even though...after Blascovich and Bailenson let some of the cats out in the open... you may now find even Pircig somewhat "pedestrian," after all those deep thoughts of yours.

The contents of this book are great. But the book itself definitely needs work, but he pages are too thin, almost Bible-like, even the cover is too thin and floppy.