Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism

"Abusing Science" is a simple, straightforward, and yet deep and lucid work. Kitcher is a philosopher of science, and philosophers have the unfortunate tradition of being bad writers--not Kitcher. The book flows beautifully, is very well organized, and exhausts the topics it purports to tackle. The refutation of classic creationist arguments (Henry Morris, the Institute for Creation Research, the Moral Majority, etc.) is without mercy, and yet Kitcher never falls in the trap of claiming the moral or otherwise absolute superiority of science. His goal is merely to show that whatever it is, creationism is not science; it may have its own merits (not discussed herein), but it has none as a scientific discipline.Chapter 1 provides a solid, basic background in genetics and evolutionary biology for the layman. Without these basic concepts and terminology, the rest of the book would not be as readable. Chapter 2 explains simply and lucidly what science is and what the evolutionary theory is all about. It is the most informative, key chapter of the book. Chapters 3 and 4 debunk creationists' critiques and faulty assumptions about evolutionary theory in good detail, showing how flawed their reasoning is. Chapter 5 expounds the various types of creationism extant and their (indeed very limited) propositive claims. Chapters 6 and 7, finally, argue against "equal time" for creationism and evolutionary theory in high school science classes, and why evolution is not synonymous of atheism and immorality. The final chapter is written in cooperation with Kantian scholar Patricia Kitcher.The reader needs to keep one key fact in mind: this book was written and published in 1982. So there are several things it does NOT include.*** Intelligent design. There is no reference to ID whatsoever. This was before Johnson, Behe, Dembski, and others. Needless to say, ID is merely creationism in another dress, so most of Kitcher's objections will (retrospectively) apply to ID as well.*** Dawkins' contributions to evolutionary biology. "The Selfish Gene" had already been written, but Kitcher does not discuss gene selection vs. organism selection, nor of sexual selection.*** Gould's contributions. Punctuated equilibrium was already there, too, but Kitcher does not discuss it at length, probably because creationists did not take much issue with it before the late 80s.*** The Human Genome Project. It had not even started back then.*** Evolutionary psychology. Kitcher does hint at it in the final chapter, but this was a budding field then, and his assumptions about morality could be revised in the light of it (although they're still generally on target).Finally, my only issue with this book is the treatment of theological issues in the last chapter. Kitcher argues in favor of a reconciliation of science and religion, that is, that a Darwinian can be a Christian--just not a fundamentalist, literal-reading-of-the-Bible one. However, there are many more issues that make evolutionary theory incompatible with even mainstream and watered-down Christianity, primarily the fact that religion would have to revert to sterile deism if it were to survive at all. Kitcher does not focus on these issues, but after all, it was never the scope of his book to do so. For more complete discussions of that issues, there are other texts (Haught, Miller, etc.)Overall, "Abusing Science" is an excellent refutation of classic, old-school creationism and a GREAT starting point for research in the modern evolution-ID debate.

In Chapter 1, the author delves into a discussion on genes and chromosomes which is too technical for me. Besides, there is nothing in that chapter which a Creationist wouldn't stipulate.In Chapters 2 and 3, the author philosophizes. Those chapters did not seem helpful because most Creationists are unable to understand anything but short and concrete answers.In Chapter 4, though, the book really starts getting good. Here, he discusses the usual nonsense over thermodynamics, mutations, transitional fossils, and anamolous footprints. Chapter 5 discusses flood geology, Creationist kinds, and macro- micro-evolution foolishness. Chapter 6 discusses evolution in the school, Creationist degrees real and bogus, and out-of-context quotes. Here is something which one can use against Creationists.I didn't like the last chapter so well. The author and his wife, who co-authored this chapter, tell us that there is no proof that the Bible is not necessarily right and that Evolution is not amoral. I alrady knew that the Bible is not necessarily right, and they could have said more about animal instincts.

In Chapter 1, the author delves into a discussion on genes and chromosomes which is too technical for me. Besides, there is nothing in that chapter which a Creationist wouldn't stipulate.In Chapters 2 and 3, the author philosophizes. Those chapters did not seem helpful because most Creationists are unable to understand anything but short and concrete answers.In Chapter 4, though, the book really starts getting good. Here, he discusses the usual nonsense over thermodynamics, mutations, transitional fossils, and anamolous footprints. Chapter 5 discusses flood geology, Creationist kinds, and macro- micro-evolution foolishness. Chapter 6 discusses evolution in the school, Creationist degrees real and bogus, and out-of-context quotes. Here is something which one can use against Creationists.I didn't like the last chapter so well. The author and his wife, who co-authored this chapter, tell us that there is no proof that the Bible is not necessarily right and that Evolution is not amoral. I alrady knew that the Bible is not necessarily right, and they could have said more about animal instincts.

Philip Kitcher's "Abusing Science" is one of the classic works in the evolution/creationism debate. Now outdated, having been first published in 1982, it remains a fundamental source in debunking the arguments of creationists. It is not a history of the debate, although elements of historical analysis are present; it is not a balanced discussion of the debate in which both sides are evenly represented, although he sometimes offers the creationist perspective; it is not a primer for debate, although it may profitably be read for that purpose."Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism" is essentially an overview of the major elements of the controversy and a well-researched, ably-organized, and effectively argued polemic that will be helpful to those accepting the concept of evolution, even as it points up the myriad weaknesses of the concept of creationism. There is nothing in this book, because of its publication more than 25-years ago there is nothing on the latest iteration of the creationist onslaught, "intelligent design." Neither it, nor the efforts of William A. Dembski, Michael J. Behe, and Philip E. Johnson are even mentioned.Notwithstanding its datedness in the on-going war over scientific knowledge, and whether it will be accepted or trashed by the creationists, "Abusing Science" continues to make a contribution as a useful brief introduction to the origins and arguments of creationism and the scientific responses to those religious (but certainly not scientific) ideas.