Full description not available
D**Y
War In The Cold
Comments on Delves’ Across the Angry SeaDelves’ describes in often fine prose the beauty and the awfulness of combat, in frozen and little known precincts of the South Atlantic. Why risk lives and equipment in a chancy attempt to regain an almost uninhabitable piece of ice and stone, South Georgia, from a third rate military and diplomatic power---Argentina? Margaret Thatcher, knowing little about war, risked her brave boys and spent billions of pounds on chunks of rock and ice that few valued at tuppence. US Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State concluded, in despair, that if the UK lost this petty conflict, the alliance between the United States and Great Britain and the agreements among both our NATO allies might suffer irrevocable wrents. The South Georgia affair was a political event colored by the dramatic use of small military units. The electorate was cowed into the notion that Britain retained the upper hand and that Argentina’s cessation of the war was close at hand. They needed action. Delves work shows bravery, clumsiness, hubris and wastage at their most frantic. Mistakes too. No Argentine subs thwarted HMS Antrim or the landing parties. Most stayed at home. Only three Argentine torpedoes are known to have been fired. None hit. SAS’ raid on Pebble Island, a site thought erroneously to be a major Argentine Air Force facility offers a template for what followed. The target was a squadron of Pucara attack planes. They had been transferred from their base at Goose Green for reasons of safety. The Pucara was a failed military weapon. After two Pucaras went nose into the mud on takeoff from Goose Green the second pilot was discarded to lessen weight, as were the principal weaponry and half the fuel load. The remaining pilot navigated, lined up targets, dropped the bomb and if unwounded and alive flew home alone. The squadron’s pilots were nearly unanimous in declining to fly combat missions. A few flew. Twelve hundred of the plane’s maintenance men and their tools were left at Goose Green. The probability of an attack on British troops or ships was close to zero. Delves had selected the planes as a ripe military target. No defense was expected and none was offered. Delves’ small and capable raiding force destroyed all the grounded planes. During the force’s exfiltration two senior sergeants decided to resolve their simmering dispute the old-fashioned way. After inflicting damage on each other they rejoined their unit showing if nothing else that Delves’ D Squadron was not a happy Band of Brothers. Here begins the back story that foretells the action on South Georgia. Both the Wets in Thatcher’s cabinet and a little informed electorate wanted action followed by a negotiated settlement. Nott the UK Minister of Defense and Pym the Foreign Secretary put their faith in Occam’s Razor. South Georgia was the blade. The electorate wanted action. General Peter de la Billiere the head of British Special Forces hung about Cabinet Offices and imposed the belief on whomever he could find that his troops could, unaided by the heavy battalions, prick the Argentines into quitting. South Georgia had no heavy guns, anti-air defense, lines of defense or economic value. It had no strategic value to either belligerent. Yet the Cabinet, advised or perhaps badgered by General de la Billiere took little convincing. A mission to retake South Georgia was put underway on April 7th, 1982.Delves omitted from his narrative that he, his immediate boss LtCol. Mike Rose based on Ascension Island and the SAS commander in Britain used the US TACSAT that provided excellent communications among them. It had the further purpose of evading the established chain of command that spread from Northwood the HQ for the Falklands effort to all units under their purview. General De La Billiere (DLB)and Rose could offer suggestions and commands to Delves before, during and after the operation. This doubling of communications cast doubt on whose the raid was. Who owned it: conventional forces or the SAS; Northwood via Sheridan or De la Billiere via the American donated TACSAT. Delves’ narrative is replete with hubristic sometimes silly statements. “We assumed the Americans had to be listening on our TACSAT conferences” p 16. Wrong. Relatively junior officers’ chatter was of no interest.“As the war progressed the US showed…support. P. 16 Two weeks before Argentina invaded the Falklands US SecNav John Lehman had an inkling that war was about to begin. He sent two small tankers of oil to Ascension Island for the British navy to refuel. That is before the UK knew that war was on. The US government did not wait to help the UK”“He was the designated land force commander and Brian Young our boss.” P. 26. Young CO of HMS Antrim was “Boss” until the troops landed. From that moment Sheridan was the commander of all British forces on South Georgia.Delves inserted his men on 21 April1982P. 31 “Should news of our moves seep out…” P. 34 “We had to get eyes on the target”. P. 28 “close in recce.” The British Antarctic Survey had five huts scattered about South Georgia inhabited by their scientists who monitored the island closely. They sent their reports en clair to their Cambridge HQ, Dr. Richard Laws, who passed them to Rear Admiral Tony Wheatly RN at Northwood. None of their reports showed Argentine military movement. P. 37 “We should approach the target with utmost caution…..could take four to five days to complete the task.” Delves writes as though planning the Normandy invasion. It was not. Napoleon did not await Wellington on South Georgia.Little known from the narrative in Delves’ book is that prior to the landing Sheridan and Lt.Col. Keith Eve RA had drawn up a meticulous fire plan for HMS Antrim’s guns to destroy whatever troops and their positions lay ashore. The Fire Plan (The reviewer has a copy) was war college perfect and would demoralize any soldier on the wrong end. It worked. No resistance was offered. Major Sheridan landed his own small Head Quarters group and M Company Group from 42 Commando, adequate to put paid to any chilled-out Argentines. The RM force, ably commanded and knowing their goals was the singular combat British force on the ground on South Georgia. Delves’ valiant men were not.The reader should know that the Soviets out up at least six geo-centric satellites over the Falkland Islands and South Georgia. The US SecDef Cap Weinberger diverted, at great cost six American satellites from their normal missions in order to monitor closely activities of both Argentina and the UK and anyone else who might show curiosity about this peculiar affair. The take from these missions was sent promptly to the UK. This reviewer ran, with a small team, an SR-71 mission that made two passes over the Falklands and South Georgia. The results of this mission were also delivered to the UK. Delves writes that he set out on the mission with almost no ground knowledge. He had all the ground data he needed had he looked or listened. So did the rest of the military world.Delves insistence that a covert patrol be inserted atop Fortuna Glacier was opposed by many of HMS Endurance’s crew who had foot on the ground experience atop the glacier. Sheridan a former RM Olympic team member and others with similar experience opposed the landing claiming that the crevasses were large enough to prevent the SAS from pulling their pulks safely. BAS Peter Stark had lived on the island for two years steadfastly opposed landing on Fortuna. Delves disagreed. SAS troops landed by helicopter. In the event no lives were lost, but the SAS landing party, marooned for many hours in awful weather had to extracted from the glacier at great risk, the loss of their equipment and the destruction of two badly needed and borrowed helicopters. The heroic rescue of Delves’ men, approached disaster; the helo pilot’s performance was extraordinary. The survivors of this misfortune were rescued from Fortuna Glacier and recovered from frostbite and other annoyances over the next few days. Delves underestimation of the terrible weather and poor judgement was foreseen by many aboard the HMS Antrim and gave the Wets in London talking points sufficient to pause the war. Yet good advice and hard data went unheeded by Delves and his superiors.This failed mission had reverberations. First, Argentina knew that combat seemed likely. Second the destruction of two helicopters strained the logistic efforts of the ground effort on East Falkands. Delves devotes many words to the baggage his unit carried south. On his Boat Troop’s list were outboard motors that had failed in previous exercises. In his reconnaissance of Stromness three of same five engines failed, the men rescued after great and hazardous effort. Why bring faulty gear to war when it had been shown regularly to fail? A few marines scanned Delves’ Mountain troop’s climbing gear. It was found to be standard army issue. Why ordinary equipment for elite troops?Delves’ insertion of D Squadron onto South Georgia had taken place on 21 April 1982. For all the disputes, planning, lack of sleep and horrid weather no battle ever ensued. Delves, men leap frogged over the Royal Marines to be the first to enter and capture Grytviken, South Georgia’s main village and its contents. On the way they fired two Milan ani-tank missiles at presumed military targets. No tanks existed on the island. Delves’ men did hit and kill two elephant seals. Delves’ awkwardness continued. Later during the siege of Port Stanley Delves was tasked with reconnaissance of MT. Kent prior to Lt.Col. Nick Vaux’ brilliantly prepared and executed plan for taking that strategic object. Vaux has written publicly that he never received the needed data from Delves.War casts strange shadows. During the war an ill connected fuel hose from a shore side trunk to HMS Plymouth spewed fuel over this reviewer’s crisp white uniform and burned his right leg. Never sent HMG a bill. David J. Kenney
D**S
An interesting account
An interesting read from the SF perspective of the Falklands campaign. While lacking in grit in places it gave good insight into the planning and considerations faced by a combat leader.
S**E
Best Falklands War book i have read (of many!!)
Loved it. He really takes you into the action and especially the physical environment- the sub-antarctic temperatures, ferocious storms and terrifying seas. I have read many books on the FW but most have been potted histories. This book gives you a real sense for the difficult dilemmas inherent in leading a fighting force 8000 mimes from home - and at the tip of the spear. Powerful stuff.
T**R
Excellent After Action Review
One of the best first-hand accounts of the Falklands War that I've read. Highly recommended.
C**N
Good Read
First-Hand Officer's account of the retaking of Stanley. Good dry humour and loved reading it. I WAS after something a bit more 'gritty' and am still looking for a book that was written from a foot-soldier's perspective.
A**T
Worth the read—if one has nothing else to do.
The author doesn't have much to write about, and what he does he manages to make uninteresting.
K**R
Great book!
Excellent book. You get the whole picture, not only the fighting but the reasoning behind it all. Also, it gives a good insight to the times it was set in, highly recommended.
K**S
Interesting and INformative Read
But, not the riveting account I expected.
C**T
An outstanding book, beautifully written.
This is a tale of courage, ingenuity, forbearance, humanity and a ruthless determination to win through. General Delves captures the drama with fairness and balance – even those who fall short are dealt only faint praise. He especially admires the contribution of the Royal Navy and 3 Commando Brigade.There are also many lessons here for the coming generation in the Services. Delves shows how to pick apart a problem to its essentials and then form a winning plan, collaboratively but without losing control. How to get on with the other elements in a combat team and work with them. How to rise above setbacks and resist being hostage to your worst fears, whilst always keeping an open mind.Delves also shows how Special Forces operate and demonstrates what is needed for them to succeed against otherwise superior enemies (and demolishing many myths about Special Forces along the way). Crucially, he shows what happens when the things that make SF work – recce, intense preparation, go with the plan of the bloke on the spot – are missing. His last operation nearly ends in disaster as they mount a diversionary attack without time for recce or proper planning.I was privileged to be one of Delves’ contemporaries and it was great for the curtain to be lifted, at last, to learn what actually happened!
N**T
A well written and measured account of D Squadrons Falklands exploits
A very interesting, informative and well written book. I had a personal interest in reading this , as I served on HMS Antrim during the South Atlantic campaign and kept my watches as a flight deck handler (good old SMAC19/233 for any of you old Jack out there!) giving me a grandstand view of the comings and goings of the SAS. I can remember Delves pacing around the hangar and flight deck waiting for his lads to be rescued from Fortuna glacier on South Georgia, it was a relief to us all to get them back but more so to him obviously! Back to the book, Delves doesn't really miss a beat with this, he describes his part in proceedings with refreshing modesty and holds his hands up to his own foibles, his description of nearly calling down HMS Glamorgans Naval Gunfire Support onto his own assault troops during the Pebble Island raid, was a real eye-opener as for years I'd always imagined that raid as the epitome of a smooth combined arms operation...which it mostly was to be fair. I would recommend this book highly, a fascinating account of a pretty unique set of operations, giving full credit to the troops that "made it so" (a Naval expression that Delves obviously liked and adopted), written by one of Britains premier soldiers.
G**R
Best of British
Very well written account of SF in the Falklands. Clearly a very intelligent, thoughtful, humane man with, despite a very tolerant view of his fellow man, a streak of utter ruthlessness. There are new revelations here. Perhaps most importantly the role of the C-in-C Sandy Woodward who achieved the key strategic goal of defeating the Argentine naval threat by feinting an attack on Port Stanley. This enabled him to force his enemy to concentrate his key assets in a place where he could destroy them-General Belgrano was sunk and their navy never presented a credible threat thereafter.
A**7
So far, an outstanding book
This is an inspiringly humble and gripping account of D Squadron’s Falklands War. I’m a third of the way in and can’t put it down. It’s captivating, very well written with blow by blow tales of determination in the face of adversity alongside calm reflection on the underpinning relationships and leadership decisions.So far, a great book and having just read them, complimentary to First Casualty by Ricky D Phillips and Exocet Falkands by Ewen Southby-Tailyour.
D**H
Not what I expected
I was a little disappointed with the book.. I knew one of the guys in D Sqn who was on Fortuna glacier, the Pebble Island raid and later the tragic helicopter crash in which he perished : R E Armstrong (Paddy) I know after pebble island he got the nickname Pucara Paddy because of all the aircraft he destroyed. He was a good mate of mine, we served in 1RGJ Recce platoon together. I still remember the night he told me he was going on selection. I am surprised there isn’t a memorial list of names of the guys killed in the South Atlantic campaign in the book itself. I worked in the Ministry of Defence ASD1 just after the Falklands, and read an official account of the Pebble Island raid, written by Cedric Delves, it was much better. At the end of the report he said something like; “It was easier to get the Sqn onto the objective than it was to get them off.. I laughed..
Trustpilot
1 month ago
1 day ago