The British Mad Dog: Debunking the Myth of Winston Churchill by M S King (2016-03-20)

This fat zionist pig started the second world war. He was also instrumental in persuading Asquith to take Britain in to the European conflict of 1914, thus creating the first world war. He was a third rate war correspondent, not a soldier. The men and officers of both wars called him the'meddler' as he was always interfering in military affairs.He was jealous of Germany's success, and in his haste to smash that nation, he bankrupted his own country, making it the prostitute of the USA and thus dissolving the British Empire and all the investments therein. He was the most evil mass-murderer of the 20th century.

So the writer thinks Hitler was a peace loving person and a gifted artist. Has he seen any of his paintings? His paintings were rejected as they were not very good. Writer sounds like he was in favour of Hitler and biased against Churchill. It put me off enjoying the book.

I grew up with a dislike of Churchill from my mother. I have read many books covering the period of this well researched and written book. And have come to very much the same view. The failure of the author to accept the crimes carried out by German and Japanese does let the book down. A very good read

Very well researched and hard to debunk, the author even offers a cash prize for anyone who can. I was aware of Churchill's incompetence during the Boer War and the role he played in the sinking of the Lusitania which left over 1000 civilians dead. But this book exposes Churchill for the most over rated individual he was.Readers should carry out their own research after reading in order to corroborate and satisfy themselves as to the truth.

Views of interest hidden in vitriolic attacks. There is a complete conflation of communism that would operate in the interests of people with Stalinist forms. Treat book with caution to extract some useful historical perspectives.

Not read yet

This is an utterly appalling rant that argues that Germany under Hitler was a peace-loving nation, rather than a nation that loved pieces of other countries. The points about Churchill are on occasion quite reasonable, but they are in a very odd context and I would recommend other readers to give this a wide berth.

Glad to obtain this book,arrived 3 days late but worth it.

I have never read such a book filled with Hate, Jealously and Hypocrisy. If King had stuck to facts he could prove instead of going into the realms of fantasy and calling people names this might have been a 1/4 decent book.But then what does one expect from someone who denies the Holocaust happened.Sad.

Another great book by Mike King.Churchill was one of the main instigators of World War II.Of course, he was just a willing puppet of the International Bankers, same with Wilson and FDR.Read the book, it's very enlightening.

This book reveals the difference between the truth and lies! That which is taught by the censored historians,in comparison to what really occurred is a sad reality of what really happens in this world .I hope more people will try to seek the truth rather than just being entertained by a story. This book has given me factual verification of the legends I heard of before,which were a little different in their description ,and,therefore untrue. A good easy to read and well presented book.

This book seriously conflicted me. As it happens I agree with many of the sentiments that the author expresses in his book on Churchill. I am relatively well read on the subject, & I also think that Churchill managed his PR exclusively for his own benefit, especially his record of WW11 which is the accepted history, but which shamelessly inflates his own successes, & which does not accord well with what actually happened. Churchill had a lurid history of recklessly & ruthlessly attacking his enemies [to the prejudice of his own troops], & as a military strategist he was at best mediocre & more probably a disaster. One only has to read Allan Brook's diaries to get a more honest appraisal of Churchill's war.Why then the low rating for this book ?Simply put, it is written in such an inflammatory manner, & so scathing of Churchill on every single issue, deserved or not, that inevitably the reader quickly becomes sated with the lurid & rude commentary. In many places it reads like a schoolboy's essay on his sworn enemies. By the end of the book I could stomach no more. This author is not for me, & I would suggest that he would have greater success if he adopted a more thoughtful & less inflammatory style..

This book is laced with bias, use of emotionally charged adjectives, using capital letters like you would in a facebook post, and constant pro-Nazi statements. I doubt many professional biographers refer to their subjects as a 'little bitch'. The references at the end are web searches - hardly credible. And to suggest you read his own work as a back up for this work - how very ridiculous! I wish I could get my money back for this!