Suunto MC-2G In Global Compass

Great compass overall! This compass is overkill with nice luxury features, but most importantly, it is a Suunto, which means you can bet your life on it. Suunto is one of few compasses that I trust. The MC-2G is nicer and more expensive than you really need to go in regards to a well-designed, functional compass you can trust. If you don't care about all the bells and whistles and the need for a Global needle (needle that is designed for both Northern and Southern hemispheres), you would do just fine with the Suunto M-3 for about half the price of the MC-2G, or perhaps the MC-2D/LIN coming in at under $50. But if you're ok dropping around $65-$70 on a base plate compass, you will not be disappointed with the MC-2G.I would like to note that I did not receive the MC-2GIn/USGS version with the 1:24k Romer scale, which was the version advertised in the listing. What I received was the metric version with the 1:25k and 1:50k Romer scales. If you're looking to purchase this compass, please be aware that there are three versions of this compass. It's helpful to know what you are purchasing, even though in my case I still received the "wrong" compass than what was advertised in the listing.The three versions of the MC-2G are as follows:1) The metric version (SS004252010) with Romer scales are 1:25k and 1:50k. Centimeters listed along the left side of the compass, and inches broken down into 1/20th on the right side. This is the compass I received.2) The USGS/Inch version (SS014891000.) with 1:24k Romer scale for use with 7.5 minute/1:24k USGS topo maps. This is the one I thought I was purchasing based on the listing.3) The mils scale version (SS016326000).I haven't frequently used 1:50k maps since my military days, but even though I received the wrong model of the MC-2G with 1:25k and 1:50k Romer scales, I'm well-versed in land nav/using a map and compass, including MGRS, so the metric version is just fine and in no way impacts the overall functionality of the compass when using a 7.5 topo. Having the 1:25k and 1:50 Romers referenced vs. not having 1:24k Romer referenced on this particular model is not a huge issue and definitely not as important as knowing how to properly use a compass and map together. And since this metric version does have an inch ruler broken down into 1/20ths (nice feature) along the right side of the compass, you can still deal quite easily with a 7.5 minute topos based on 1-inch = 2,000 feet, which is the scale of a 1:24k/7.5 minute Topo map.There are a few cons I'd like to point out based on initial use:1) One of the rubber feet on the back of the base plate does not protrude like the other two. This must be a manufacturer defect.2) Too much force is required to snap the lid shut, so much that I thought I would damage the the compass snapping the lid. I'll just close the compass when not in use, but will not snap the lid shut.3) The plastic lanyard attachment is concerning. The design is flawed and doesn't give me warm fuzzies that the lanyard attachment will keep the compass attached to the lanyard in the long run. I've decided not to use the lanyard attachment and instead have attached the lanyard directly to the compass with a larks head knot. Now I don't need to worry about the lanyard detaching from the compass.All in all, this compass was a great buy and I like it. Having the 1:24k Romer scale referenced would have been nice given I primarily use 7.5 topos for back country excursions, but the 1:24k scale is definitely not essential if you're familiar with land nav and using a map and compass. And for me, it's not a big enough deal breaker and worth the hassle to return it for the USGS version. I still use an MGRS Coordinate Grid reader/plotter, which references several map scales, including 1:24k. So, receiving the metric vs. the USGS version of this compass isn't a deal breaker for me, but may be for a buyer who really just wants a compass designed for 7.5minute/1:24k USGS topo maps.If you're looking for a great compass with all the bells, whistles, and luxuries you'll ever need, look no further than the MC-2G. However, be prepared to potentially deal with a few flaws like those I've pointed out.

The Image used for the “Inches Global” option isn’t the right model and the product description is only for the metric model.The model I received was the “Suunto MC-2 G USGS Mirror Compass” Model # SS014891000 for the “Inch” version.The description is for the “Suunto MC-2 G Mirror Compass” Model # SS004252010 which would be the Metric/CM versionThe only other real ‘Global” one in this line is the “Suunto MC-2/G/6400” Model # SS016326000 which would be the mils scale version.I have Romer scale cards anyway so I wasn’t particularly worried about getting the wrong one, however it is nice having it built into the compass for convenience.Running off CaptainAJ’s post.1) CaptainAJ Mentioned one of the rubber feet being too short on their compass. One of the rubber feet on the back of the base plate was completely missing on mine. This might be a manufacturer issue that somehow passed inspection, or it might be that this was a re-packaged unit. Regardless, it is disappointing.2) Too much force is required to snap the lid shut. The only aftermarket fix I can think of would be to modify it a little with a jewelers file to reduce the strain on the clasp and make it easier to close.3) I agree that the plastic “Detachable snap-lock lanyard with wristlock” is concerning. I am not confidant that the snap-lock will keep the compass attached to the lanyard in the long run. As CaptainAJ did, I also decided not to use the lanyard attachment and instead have attached the lanyard directly to the compass with a larks head knot.

I purchased this compass because of a book on compass navigation recommending a baseplate compass (check) a sighting mirror (check), and adjustable declination (check). The Suunto MC-2G was on the list. In addition to all of the highly recommended functions this also has a global needle, clinometer and glowing bezels, north needle, and orienteering dots. Having a Suunto A10 that works perfectly, I thought why not buy the better model? I can always use the A10 as a backup. I was excited when I saw the compass in the package like a kid on Christmas morning but the excitement was short lived. As I turned round to test the needles movement the needle would get stuck on the clinometer needle. I'm holding the compass perfectly level and it's getting stuck. It's easy to get the needle unstuck because it barely grazes the clinometer but to me, that's a deal breaker. I noticed that the north seeking arrow dipped down quite a bit with the black needle sitting high. The entire needle was like a playground seesaw with an adult on one end and a child on the other - that severe. I returned it the same day I got it. So disappointing.

Die Qualität der Kompasse von Suunto/Recta ist einfach Spitze. Hierbei handelt es sich um die globale Version. Das bedeutet die Nadellagerung ist getrennt vom Magneten was eine Verwendung in Gebieten mit starker Inklination (meist auf der Südhalbkugel) ermöglicht. Das spiegelt sich allerdings auch im Preis etwas wieder. Dennoch würde ich sagen liegt dieser Kompass im guten Mittelfeld was den Preis betrifft.Beim MC-2G handelt es sich um einen Hybridkompass, welcher die Vorteile eines reinen Kartenkompass (Transparente Bodenplatte) und einem Peilkompass vereint. Dies schafft er meiner Meinung nach auch sehr gut.Ich habe mich für die 6400 Strich Variante entschieden, da ich bei der Bundeswehr diese ebenfalls nutze. Es gestaltet sich meiner Meinung nach einfacher mit 64 zu arbeiten (Bspw. Beim umgehen von Hindernissen) als mit 360°. Anzumerken ist allerdings das die Deklinationskorrektur in Grad eingestellt wird.Die Problematik mit den unterschiedlich hohen bzw. eingelassenen Gummifüssen kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. Da es nur drei Füße sind, ist es eigentlich total egal ob einer höher ist oder nicht. Wackeln tut dort definitiv nichts wenn man nicht eine Seite belastet.Etwas schade finde ich allerdings das sich die Kompassdose etwas schwer drehen lässt. Vielleicht ist es nur mein persönliches Empfinden, was ich aber nicht glaube. Ich besitze mit diesem Kompass jetzt den vierten Kompass überhaupt. Alle von namhaften Herstellern wie Silva, Recta oder Breithaupt und muss sagen bei allen dreht die Dose etwas leichter.Auch das oft angesprochene Axialspiel an der Dose selbst ist tatsächlich vorhanden. Allerdings hält es sich im Rahmen und somit auch in der Toleranz der Herstellerangabe.

Nach diversem Spielzeug längst vergangener Jahre ist dies mein erster "amtlicher" Kompass und ich bin begeistert.Scheinbar solide Verarbeitung, angenehme Größe, zuverlässige gedämpfte Anzeige, globale Verwendung und durchdachte Zusatzfeatures, wie Skalen, Lupe, Lanyard, Neigungsmesser, fluoreszierender Kapselring und untere Peilöffnung.Die Kartenarbeit klappt damit ganz hervorragend und auch das Peilen im Gelände ist einfach.Wer einen universellen + verlässlichen Kompass sucht ist mit diesem Suunto gut beraten.Auch, wenn er vielleicht etwas über dem zunächst geplanten Budget liegen sollte.Die hier bislang gepostete Negativrezension kann ich nicht bestätigen,für Aussagen zu Wasserdichtigkeit, Beschädigungsresistenz und Blasenbildung fehlen mir noch die passenden Einsätze.

Excellent quality and features.Easy to use.The clinometer will require a rest to hold it in position while you read it or you can get someone else to read the angle while you sight the slope.

Cercavo una bussola "seria" per l'outdoor e il trekking e la mia scelta è caduta su questo modello per le seguenti ragioni.Quadrante ampio, comodo da leggere e accurato nella realizzazione della scala graduata (la bussola nel suo complesso è accuratamente progettata).Ago compensato per l'uso globale: non è strettamente necessario per chi rimane nell'emisfero Nord, tuttavia la compensazione globale rende l'ago più "stabile" nel suo utilizzo.Amazon però dovrebbe garantire che le foto dell'oggetto mostrato in rete corrispondano all'oggetto reale. Nel mio caso la bussola è dotata di scale anglosassoni anzichè scale metriche come indicato nella foto. Il funzionamento della bussola è assolutamente indipendente da questo, ma chi vuole usare anche le scale sulla carta deve stare attento ad acquistare il modello con scale metriche (che però costa di più!!???)

Ho acquistato questa bussola nel settore delle occasioni, pagandola circa la metà del prezzo a nuovo. La bussola si presenta molto bene, la sensazione è di solidità. Il liquido smorza subito le oscillazioni dell'ago, che oltretutto è globale, quindi tra l'altro dovrebbe risentire meno anche della inclinazione dello strumento sul piano orizzontale.Ho avuto modo di effettuare alcuni rilievi di prova, l'impressione è di precisione, lo strumento permette misurazioni accurate, soprattutto dopo averci preso un po' la mano. Ho paragonato i valori trovati con quelli di un'altra bussola - da rilievo con lettura a prisma - e sono del tutto sovrapponibili.Purtoppo le scale riportate sul corpo trasarente sono quelle anglosassoni, e questo potrebbe essere un limite nell'uso cartografico, ma dopotutto lo sapevo al momento dell'acquisto e non è un problema grave.

Tja ich bin sehr enttäuschtIn den Beschreibungen steht immer etwas von flüssigkeit in der Dose, tja bei mir is ma keine drinn und die Nadel pendelt sich auch nicht schnell ein.... warm, weil sie sich ständig mit der Dose berührt das Ding taugt ma nix... Ziele anpeilen und einen azimuth bestimmen dauert ewig u D ist letztendlich glücksache.Hab das Ding echt vor Wut in die Tonne gehauen und weggeschmissen und benutze wieder meinen alten recta. (HAT 0 STERNE Verdient) aber ohne kann man das nicht abschicken.

Have used other suunto compasses in the past. This one is no exception. Excellent quality and accuracy

J'ai remplacé ma Recta DS 56G par ce modèle ... bien sur ... c'est la même boussole ... ou presque !!!- plus de table de conversion degré %- echelles sur les côtés en inch et mile- index de déclinaison TRES mal fait qui induit des IMPRECISIONSLa Recta méritait 5 étoiles, passée chez Suunto qui l'a dégradée elle passe à 3.Même à lui seul l'index de déclinaison justifie la perte d'au moins 2 etoiles.Dommage !