Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution

I thought I understood Bourbon France, and the revolution...but I was woefully under-informed. This book brings Louis XVI France into sharpe focus and introduces an ENLIGHTENED monarchy and French zeitgiest that is both credible, and satisfying due to its access to recent scholarship. If you really want to understand why Louis and Marie-Antoinette have been wronged by history, but largely brought about their own doom, read/listen to this great history.

Why four stars? It has been long recognised as a classic and I am surprised to see it weakly reviewed on Amazon. It rates its four stars.It is now old, (1989 I think) but it was written by an extremely young historian who has since become almost disgustingly successful. So If you want to know how “success is done” in literature and the media you would be very well advised to read it as a starter. But DON’T treat it like a worthy text book. It is meant to read very swiftly, and you would be advised to do this. It is also rather long, and a fast read is a good way to take it all in.Why should a young person read this? Because this is the way history should be presented to the layman and it should be read at great pace. Don’t pore over this book, shamelessly burn your way through it at a far higher pace than you would read a text book on the French revolution. If you are doing a history-course for grades, you can go back to pick-and-choose later.What was the high point for me? Definitely it was the messy death of Robespierre. I rather enjoy disgustingly sanctimonious murderers getting their well-deserved end. Yucky but satisfying.What character stood out? For me it was Talleyrand. (The highly irreligious bishop of Autun). An infinitely devious and cunning man but for all that; rather human.

A huge quantity of research must have been done for this book. This book and Henry Kissinger's books offer excellent opportunity for the reader to improve vocabulary. Schama's writing lacks beauty, as found in, for example, the Iliad and parts of the Bible. But his use of mild cynicism makes for interesting reading. I had to read some sentences twice or more, given that often long qualifiers are inserted mid sentence, and given that his run-on style includes liberal use of complexity.An easier book to read, because it uses a common writing style, is Christopher Hibbert's The Days of The French Revolution. Hibbert's book also provides more detail and a more comprehensible explanation of many facts, including a good description of the political storm surrounding the condemnation to the guillotine of the Revolutions leaders such as the Girondins, Desmoulins, Danton, St Just, and Rosbespierre. Hibbert's book, unlike Schama's, provides the reasons why Fouquier-Tinville was depicted (accurately) as a horrendous villan in Baroness Orczy's wonderful book and play, The Scharlet Pimpernel.A few things apparent are: (1) The Revolution was driven by fear and terror, and (2) humankind, or at lease French humankind, was ready and even eager to send neighbors and associates to the guillotine. Unlike other historians, Schama does not try to gloss over the brutallity, nor does he emphasize it. Schama offers possible explanations for why The Terror happened, but I think he fails. It was almost as if a collective insanity overtook the country, an insanity that craved relief from boredom by feeding on blood and fear.Of course the spoken targets were the rich, the nobility, and the clergy. But in the end it could not be confined to these groups, but became anybody who remotely seemed like a political opponent. As early as March, 1793 Pierre Vergniaud, who himself eventually went to the guillotine, offered to the tribune this terrible prophecy: "So, citizens, it must be feared that the Revolution, like Saturn, successively devouring its children, will engender, finally, only despostism with the calamities that accompany it". Despotism indeed was the fruit of the Revolution. But it was not Saturn that did the devouring, but the children of Saturn.In many ways the French Revolution and, for that matter, the monarchy of King Louis XVI, preceeded the social engineering advocated by Lenin and Marx. A social safety net, wage and price controls, and taxation of products, land and incomes, were halmarks of the Revolution. Many of these reforms were later abandoned out of necessity because they caused shortages and economic stagnation.A primary component of the Revolution, which sought "liberty, justice, and fraternity", was de-Christianization of France. A lesson Schama's and Hibbert's books provide is that when men and women seek social reform by depending on "reason" absent faith in God, then the result of that reform will more often be despotism.A question that comes to mind: The story of the French Revolution is one of the most terrible episodes in modern history, partly because it was promulgated primarily by the common people rather than an elite leadership such as happened in Germany, Russia, and China. So why has Hollywood not made movies about the Revolution?Even though the guillotine was abandoned in 1795, the fear lasted for several decades, and likely prevented resistence to the massive military conscription program instituted by NapoleonBonapart 20 years later.

I am a history teacher and constantly reading books about world events. This book is unique because it gives the reader intimate details about the people involved. It does not read like your typical history book. It is not a dry list of names, dates, and events. For that, all you need is to Google “timeline of the French Revolution.” This book is special because the author did a tremendous amount of primary source research. One example is his inclusion of a sarcastic joke that Talleyrand told to his friends. The book reads like a novel. Some people are into that, some are not. If you take it slow and read for enjoyment and not for just pure information eventually you’ll see what a gem this book is. Just reading a few pages a day is something I look forward to as a little treat. I’m halfway through and don’t want it to end. I wish more history books were written like this.

Originally bought as an audio book, which I could not put down, and just had to have the hard copy. Explains why today's prices are due to rich people profiteering to maintain an exorbitant life-style and not due to the U.S. president.