

Harmonograph: A Visual Guide to the Mathematics of Music (Wooden Books, 20) [Ashton, Anthony] on desertcart.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Harmonograph: A Visual Guide to the Mathematics of Music (Wooden Books, 20) Review: Good addition to my Wooden Books library - I have about five of the books in the Wooden Books series, and this is one of my favorites. I really love sacred geometry, and this book is a very nice way to begin to understand the mathematics of music and the images sound creates. Like many of the Wooden Books, if you are already very well versed on the topic, this may not be up to your standards. However if like me, you want a concise overview, this is a great way to learn the basics of an interesting subject. Review: The most valuable part for me was the tuning theory, which is excellent - You may read the other 4-star and 5-star reviews for the readers' love of the fascination of the Harmonograph, the beauty of the drawings it can produce, and the need for a really good computer simulacrum of the thing. (I agree on that last point 150% and really it should be possible for an up-to-snuff programmer to emulate the device.) But for me the really valuable thing was the set of summaries concerning music theory, both in diagram form and verbally stated, in which I have found only a few errors via cross-checking (one is on page 53). Some reviewers have found those summaries extremely clear (as I have); some have found them hard to understand; one or two miss the deep connection between music and mathematics entirely, seemingly. What we have here mathematically is something one either understands or fails to understand. If you understand it, it will open worlds to you which you do not expect, even if you're already a talented and trained musician. Let me give you an example of such an opening. I am a specialist in the melodic rendition of Hebrew Scripture (I edited THE MUSIC OF THE BIBLE REVEALED by Suzanne Haik-Vantoura, also found as book and CD on desertcart) and thanks to this book I grasped for the first time 1) how important it really is to get one's historical tunings right, 2) why the fundamental "diatonic" scale (the "just scale" as usually so defined by physicists) used in the harmonograph demonstrations, and it alone, fits Suzanne's inferences; 3) how this scale differs from the "Pythagorean scale" which, strangely, Suzanne seems to have confounded with just tuning in one of her written discussions of the tunings of antiquity. Now bear in mind, Anthony Anton says nothing about SHV's work. He does point out that the "Pythagorean scale" suits "plainchant and drone" (by "drone" he means "organum") while the allegedly later "diatonic scale" suits "polyphony and chords" But Curt Sachs pointed out a long time ago, in MUSIC IN THE ANCIENT WORLD: EAST AND WEST, that *both kinds of tuning existed from earliest times in Mesopotamia and that the just (not the Pythagorean) tuning *predominated. Recently discovered theory texts from that area are consistent with this: there was a basic tuning Pythagorean-style, but then this was fine-tuned to the diatonic style. I would point out to Anthony today were he still alive: this means some kinds of Ancient Near Eastern music was more like much later Western plainchant on a harmonic level and some kinds were more like even later Western music from the polyphonic era onward. That doesn't mean the melodies or heterophonies were developed the same way anciently as in the medieval and later West. But Anton and Sachs together made me realize: what I work with myself in SHV's thesis is perfectly plausible historically. Not only did people use just tuning long before Western polyphony, it goes as far back as records go - as far as the tuning Pythagoras learned when studying in Egypt and Syria. Those tunings have implications for accompaniment. Ancient musicians were *not limited to octaves, fourths and fifths in accompaniment in all times and places, because they were *not limited to the Pythagorean tuning in all times and places! Anyway, I digress. HARMONOGRAPH itself packs a lot into its small space, combining ethereal beauty, mathematical wonder, a light touch in writing, mechanical, historical and human interest, simple but deep philosophical questions (a consistent feature of books by this publisher), and hidden surprises which can help anyone who is willing to follow evidence wherever it leads.
| Best Sellers Rank | #758,403 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books ) #218 in Physics of Acoustics & Sound (Books) #619 in Music Reference (Books) #1,473 in Music History & Criticism (Books) |
| Customer Reviews | 4.6 out of 5 stars 234 Reviews |
T**G
Good addition to my Wooden Books library
I have about five of the books in the Wooden Books series, and this is one of my favorites. I really love sacred geometry, and this book is a very nice way to begin to understand the mathematics of music and the images sound creates. Like many of the Wooden Books, if you are already very well versed on the topic, this may not be up to your standards. However if like me, you want a concise overview, this is a great way to learn the basics of an interesting subject.
J**R
The most valuable part for me was the tuning theory, which is excellent
You may read the other 4-star and 5-star reviews for the readers' love of the fascination of the Harmonograph, the beauty of the drawings it can produce, and the need for a really good computer simulacrum of the thing. (I agree on that last point 150% and really it should be possible for an up-to-snuff programmer to emulate the device.) But for me the really valuable thing was the set of summaries concerning music theory, both in diagram form and verbally stated, in which I have found only a few errors via cross-checking (one is on page 53). Some reviewers have found those summaries extremely clear (as I have); some have found them hard to understand; one or two miss the deep connection between music and mathematics entirely, seemingly. What we have here mathematically is something one either understands or fails to understand. If you understand it, it will open worlds to you which you do not expect, even if you're already a talented and trained musician. Let me give you an example of such an opening. I am a specialist in the melodic rendition of Hebrew Scripture (I edited THE MUSIC OF THE BIBLE REVEALED by Suzanne Haik-Vantoura, also found as book and CD on Amazon) and thanks to this book I grasped for the first time 1) how important it really is to get one's historical tunings right, 2) why the fundamental "diatonic" scale (the "just scale" as usually so defined by physicists) used in the harmonograph demonstrations, and it alone, fits Suzanne's inferences; 3) how this scale differs from the "Pythagorean scale" which, strangely, Suzanne seems to have confounded with just tuning in one of her written discussions of the tunings of antiquity. Now bear in mind, Anthony Anton says nothing about SHV's work. He does point out that the "Pythagorean scale" suits "plainchant and drone" (by "drone" he means "organum") while the allegedly later "diatonic scale" suits "polyphony and chords" But Curt Sachs pointed out a long time ago, in MUSIC IN THE ANCIENT WORLD: EAST AND WEST, that *both kinds of tuning existed from earliest times in Mesopotamia and that the just (not the Pythagorean) tuning *predominated. Recently discovered theory texts from that area are consistent with this: there was a basic tuning Pythagorean-style, but then this was fine-tuned to the diatonic style. I would point out to Anthony today were he still alive: this means some kinds of Ancient Near Eastern music was more like much later Western plainchant on a harmonic level and some kinds were more like even later Western music from the polyphonic era onward. That doesn't mean the melodies or heterophonies were developed the same way anciently as in the medieval and later West. But Anton and Sachs together made me realize: what I work with myself in SHV's thesis is perfectly plausible historically. Not only did people use just tuning long before Western polyphony, it goes as far back as records go - as far as the tuning Pythagoras learned when studying in Egypt and Syria. Those tunings have implications for accompaniment. Ancient musicians were *not limited to octaves, fourths and fifths in accompaniment in all times and places, because they were *not limited to the Pythagorean tuning in all times and places! Anyway, I digress. HARMONOGRAPH itself packs a lot into its small space, combining ethereal beauty, mathematical wonder, a light touch in writing, mechanical, historical and human interest, simple but deep philosophical questions (a consistent feature of books by this publisher), and hidden surprises which can help anyone who is willing to follow evidence wherever it leads.
B**R
Save money by buying the compilation, Quadrivium!
This book is great! If you're interested in this book and any other similar books, I suggest getting Quadrivium by Wooden Books. I made the mistake of purchasing this book and 4 others by Wooden Books, as well as Quadrivium and they are all contained in Quadrivium. I repeat, Quadrivium is a compilation of 6 Wooden Books! Buy the compilation and save big $$$
J**R
Beautiful and Fascinating
I discovered the the Wooden Books series less than a year ago through some serendipitous bookstore browsing, and soon purchased them all. Each volume is compact, well-written, beautifully illustrated, and most of all informative. I'm reading my copy of Harmonograph along with Stuart Isacoff's book Temperament (also recommended), and couldn't imagine a more perfect pairing of books. Being musically challenged, I rely on Harmonograph to make better sense of the intervals Isacoff discusses in his book, and it does so in a brilliant, unique way. You won't be disappointed in this little gem.
J**L
Delightful and Informative
If you're interested in music, math, and/or science but have a very short attention span and not much time on your hands this book is for you! Each page spread includes a short explanation accompanied by an illustration on the opposing page. Delightful and informative! A great book for the coffee table, or for short reads while on the toilet.
L**E
Extremely Information-Rich
Aside from a truly fascinating subject, the content is deliver fluff-free. Many drawings which are worth a thousand words each. Quite the reference book.
P**M
Illustrations are very small and difficult to see.
This book seems like it would be great, but most of the illustrations are too small to read. The text content is interesting.
A**R
It's hard to believe such a small book can be ...
It's hard to believe such a small book can be packed with so much information, and inspiring beauty. I was making my very own Lissajous figures, and this book quickly became a reference guide.
Trustpilot
2 weeks ago
3 days ago