Pulsar Men's Quartz Watch Stainless Steel with Metal Strap

At the price I paid (under thirty pounds) it was cheap and good value. Having had it a short while now I'd say it would still be decent value for the prices I see it going for (i.e between thirty and forty pounds .... but no more than that). It's shiny, not dull... which isn't all that clear in the photos. The strap is OK if you like that sort of thing - I've swapped it for the NATO style (I knew I would before buying it so that's not a criticism). The hands are chromed and not as visible as some others with wider, white coloured hands. There's no lume material on the hands so don't expect to see it in the dark. The second hand is red and looks quite nice. The numerals and the date are nice and clear and I'd say it looked uncluttered and attractive, especially with a nicer strap ...with a red and black ZuluDiver NATO it does look particularly nice.With the benefit of hindsight I'd still say it's a good buy, but don't pay anything like full retail if you can help it.

A beautiful watch with the perfect size, case about 39 mm, although I don't have time enough to make a detailed and accurate rating. However I may say the setting was quite easy and I took as a reference an atomic clock (Time.is website). So far there isn't any difference between the two, which is normal for a quartz watch that could change about a couple of seconds per year as far as I know.Beeing part of Seiko I expect this will be a good watch for a long time (to complement my old Raymond Weil from the early 90's a bit old fashioned, though a fantastic watch).I find the Pulsar a very good ratio price/quality.

Replacement for my waterproof Pulsar that I'd had for some years but was scratched.The new one almost the same except hands are silver rather than white so not as easy to read time

Not entirely happy. Illustration does not show that the hands are too thin to read the time at a cursory glance. Obviously a design fault rather than anything to do with the seller.